Teams

LVTA SILVER

2024 TRIO - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.31 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-21vs TAG TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeneva Ritsch / Sarah Duty vs Lori Mooney-Malone / Thora Pabst6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristi van Buren vs Beth Smits5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Moore / Magdalena Joyce vs Deirdre White / Amy Herold7-6, 6-3
2024-04-20vs FCCC PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesSage Snowdon / Amanda Snowdon vs Tara Delaney / Marla Terwilliger6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Laramore vs Denise Benz6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristi van Buren / Devin Taylor vs Michelle Kennedy / Shannon Holt6-3, 6-2
2024-04-13vs CSU GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesDevin Taylor / Stephanie Laramore vs Bethany Chambers / Emily Eiten6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStacey Hogan vs Audrie Diel6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMagdalena Joyce / Sage Snowdon vs Carri Miller / Marcia Stauter1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-03-30vs LT ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesAmanda Snowdon / Sarah Duty vs Ashley Sloan / Cindy Eisenberg6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKristi van Buren vs Kelly Tomlin2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Dunnington / Stacey Hogan vs Maka Hammock / Bettina Cosima Larrarte1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LVTA SILVER319310104
2LT ORANGE135715105
3TAG TEAL1451023163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Amanda Snowdon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Sarah Duty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Stephanie Laramore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Devin Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Kristi van Buren
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Sage Snowdon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Helen Dunnington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Geneva Ritsch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Magdalena Joyce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Stacey Hogan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi van Buren + Stephanie Laramore12167% games+18.7% vs expected
Stephanie Laramore + Sarah Duty5167% games+8.5% vs expected
Magdalena Joyce + Helen Dunnington8258% games+7.5% vs expected
Amanda Snowdon + Sage Snowdon541262% games+6.7% vs expected
Sarah Duty + Sage Snowdon3351% games+0.6% vs expected
Sarah Duty + Helen Dunnington5166% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Hogan + Geneva Ritsch314 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Hogan + Helen Dunnington123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Snowdon
84W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Sarah Duty
60W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Stephanie Laramore
90W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Devin Taylor
23W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
Kristi van Buren
58W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Sage Snowdon
80W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Helen Dunnington
49W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Geneva Ritsch
34W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Magdalena Joyce
49W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Stacey Hogan
31W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.