Teams

LT ORANGE

2024 TRIO - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-12vs LT BLUEWon 10
W#1 SinglesMaka Hammock vs Carolyn Everhart7-5, 6-1
2024-04-20vs HMTC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Short / Mariana Treat vs Kristin Daniels / Crystal Stowe7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMaka Hammock vs Alli Lackey2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Eisenberg / Kelly Tomlin vs Michelle Fang / Tracy Sanders6-1, 6-0
2024-04-06vs FCCC PURPLESplit 11
W#1 SinglesKelly Tomlin vs Jane Roberti7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaka Hammock / Cindy Short vs Angie Decklever / Michelle Kennedy4-6, 2-6
2024-03-30vs LVTA SILVERWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Sloan / Cindy Eisenberg vs Amanda Snowdon / Sarah Duty1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Tomlin vs Kristi van Buren6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMaka Hammock / Bettina Cosima Larrarte vs Helen Dunnington / Stacey Hogan6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LVTA SILVER319310104
2LT ORANGE135715105
3TAG TEAL1451023163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kelly Tomlin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Bettina Cosima Larrarte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Maka Hammock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.82
Ashley Sloan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Cindy Short
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Cindy Eisenberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Mariana Treat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Short + Mariana Treat6653% games+0.7% vs expected
Mariana Treat + Bettina Cosima Larrarte4453% games−3.8% vs expected
Cindy Short + Maka Hammock1448% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Short + Bettina Cosima Larrarte404 matchesnot enough data
Mariana Treat + Ashley Sloan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Tomlin
43W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3
Bettina Cosima Larrarte
43W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.98
3
Maka Hammock
85W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Ashley Sloan
27W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Cindy Short
32W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Cindy Eisenberg
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mariana Treat
22W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.