Teams

CDTA S A40W4.0 10Glenbrook Hans Sat 10 $25

CDTA 1Summer Adult 40 & Over wknd · nght

22 players · average NTRP 3.82 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesJulie Miller / Liz Agins vs Stephanie Thompson / Susan Klumpner6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Hans / Jennifer Goodman vs Teodora Varcheva / Maura Starshak1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTracy Meyer / Dawn Pollack vs Julie Weidner / Renee Buxton6-7, 1-5
L#2 DoublesJohanna Raimond / Melissa Basa vs Sara Desai / Sara Olson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Hans / Hillary Cohen vs Joanne Lund / Cris Montresor2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesTamara Fountain / Kimberly Horberg vs Jennifer Ligammari / Satomi Yoshizawa6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesJulie Miller / Melissa Basa vs Shelley Szela / Diane McKillen6-4, 4-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Hans / Pamela Leichtling vs Karen Light / Laurie Gray4-6, 3-5
W#1 DoublesMelissa Basa / Lisa Hans vs Bonny Tovar / Agnieszka Fijol6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Pollack / Tracy Meyer vs Gaelle Gravot / Tanja Boskovic6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A40W4.0 1Tam Corey Sun 11 $226019512128
2CDTA S A40W4.0 6Barrington Gray Sat 9 $245117718179
3CDTA S A40W4.0 5Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $224217719157
4CDTA S A40W4.0 4Barrington Willis Tue 7 $254215923186
5CDTA S A40W4.0 7MT Bann Coy Tue 6:30 $2733131125194
6CDTA S A40W4.0 9Hinsdale Cashman Tue 6:30 $2233121226200
7CDTA S A40W4.0 2Tam Lund Thu 7 $223391533221
8CDTA S A40W4.0 10Glenbrook Hans Sat 10 $252491532232
9CDTA S A40W4.0 8Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $251581633215
10CDTA S A40W4.0 11Forest View Hayashida Mon 7 $231571737241
11CDTA S A40W4.0 3River Trails Jasinski Tue 7 $261561838243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christina Turdo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Kimberly Horberg
published 4.5
3.76
Johanna Raimond
published 4
3.72
Hillary Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.72
Sally Washlow
published 4
3.71
Tina Werber
published 3.5
3.71
Tamara Fountain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Dawn Pollack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Margo Carvell
published 3.5
3.60
Youngran Chung
published 4
3.58
Tracy Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.54
Katherine Glattard
published
3.50
Melissa Basa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
3.37
Antje Boeing
published 3.5
3.30
Lisa Hans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Marina Minkina
published 3.5
3.27
Ania Snape
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Bari Izenstark
published 3.5
3.20
Karoline Babakhani
published 3.5
2.98
Nicole Putzel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Liz Agins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Meyer + Tina Werber231356% games+8.3% vs expected
Lisa Hans + Johanna Raimond3448% games+4.6% vs expected
Sally Washlow + Dawn Pollack171151% games+3.0% vs expected
Youngran Chung + Margo Carvell12855% games+2.7% vs expected
Dawn Pollack + Antje Boeing142247% games−1.6% vs expected
Marina Minkina + Ania Snape2444% games−2.8% vs expected
Youngran Chung + Lisa Hans4544% games−4.9% vs expected
Lisa Hans + Pamela Leichtling21140% games−12.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Turdo
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Kimberly Horberg
92W–28L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Johanna Raimond
103W–71L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Hillary Cohen
32W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
4
Sally Washlow
121W–150L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Tina Werber
131W–65L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.71
Tamara Fountain
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Dawn Pollack
76W–98L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Margo Carvell
138W–93L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
4
Youngran Chung
76W–87L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Tracy Meyer
76W–70L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Katherine Glattard
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Melissa Basa
11W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Pamela Leichtling
47W–107L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Antje Boeing
92W–74L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Lisa Hans
70W–95L career · 4 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
3.5
Marina Minkina
90W–129L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Ania Snape
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Bari Izenstark
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Karoline Babakhani
36W–32L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Nicole Putzel
15W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.98
Liz Agins
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.