Teams

CDTA S A40W4.0 11Forest View Hayashida Mon 7 $23

CDTA 1Summer Adult 40 & Over wknd · nght

19 players · average NTRP 3.88 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Petrova vs Katherine Mattison0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesYumi Ida / Michiko Nakagawa vs Erica Eisner / Elizabeth Huffman2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTara Brix / Nora Errico vs Stephanie Thompson / Masako Ueda6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKaori Kobayashi / Michiko Nakagawa vs Kelly Golden / Stefanie Turner4-6, 5-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Petrova vs Nicole Doherty6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElise Bergman / Tara Brix vs Apple Naughton / Denise Schneider6-4, 4-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ligammari / Satomi Yoshizawa vs Tamara Fountain / Kimberly Horberg1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesErin Wyatt vs Sally Washlow6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaori Kobayashi / Yumi Ida vs Julie Miller / Johanna Raimond4-6, 3-5
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ligammari / Sherry Polachek vs Anna Dau / Julie Steinberg3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesErin Wyatt vs Desiree Witte3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNora Errico / Terri Whiting vs Rachel Kaiser / Molly Shapiro6-3, 6-3
2025-06-12vs CDTA S A40W4.0 2Tam Lund Thu 7 $22Split 11
W#1 DoublesNora Errico / Tara Brix vs Agnieszka Fijol / Bonny Tovar6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSatomi Yoshizawa / Sherry Polachek vs Dimitrina Schoyer / Marie Reece4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesErin Wyatt vs Denise Huth2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A40W4.0 1Tam Corey Sun 11 $226019512128
2CDTA S A40W4.0 6Barrington Gray Sat 9 $245117718179
3CDTA S A40W4.0 5Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $224217719157
4CDTA S A40W4.0 4Barrington Willis Tue 7 $254215923186
5CDTA S A40W4.0 7MT Bann Coy Tue 6:30 $2733131125194
6CDTA S A40W4.0 9Hinsdale Cashman Tue 6:30 $2233121226200
7CDTA S A40W4.0 2Tam Lund Thu 7 $223391533221
8CDTA S A40W4.0 10Glenbrook Hans Sat 10 $252491532232
9CDTA S A40W4.0 8Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $251581633215
10CDTA S A40W4.0 11Forest View Hayashida Mon 7 $231571737241
11CDTA S A40W4.0 3River Trails Jasinski Tue 7 $261561838243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Terri Whiting
published 4.5
3.80
Svetlana Petrova
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.76
Lara Phillips
published 4
3.76
Yumi Ida
published 4
3.75
Jennifer Ligammari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Michiko Nakagawa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Kaori Kobayashi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Erin Wyatt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.59
Reatha Kay
published
3.56
Linda Borst
published 4
3.53
Tara Brix
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Satomi Yoshizawa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Conni Stinek
published 4
3.41
Jane Ford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Sherry Polachek
published 3.5
3.26
Elise Bergman
published 3.5
3.02
Tomoko Hayashida
published 3.5
Meg Greenberg
published
Nora Errico
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Whiting + Linda Borst281357% games+9.3% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Nora Errico13255% games+4.9% vs expected
Lara Phillips + Erin Wyatt213050% games−1.6% vs expected
Tomoko Hayashida + Erin Wyatt61045% games−4.5% vs expected
Conni Stinek + Tara Brix16651% games−6.0% vs expected
Nora Errico + Linda Borst1733% games−12.9% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Jennifer Ligammari8065% gamesnot enough data
Kaori Kobayashi + Tomoko Hayashida1738% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Terri Whiting
165W–55L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Svetlana Petrova
111W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Lara Phillips
98W–91L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Yumi Ida
185W–161L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Jennifer Ligammari
48W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Michiko Nakagawa
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
Kaori Kobayashi
21W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Erin Wyatt
44W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Reatha Kay
26W–36L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
4
Linda Borst
78W–75L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Tara Brix
27W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Satomi Yoshizawa
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Conni Stinek
139W–109L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jane Ford
76W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
3.5
Sherry Polachek
138W–76L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Elise Bergman
70W–94L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Tomoko Hayashida
116W–176L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
Meg Greenberg
30W–84L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nora Errico
22W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.