Teams

CDTA S A40W4.0 1Tam Corey Sun 11 $22

CDTA 1Summer Adult 40 & Over wknd · nght

20 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesTeodora Varcheva / Maura Starshak vs Lisa Hans / Jennifer Goodman6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Weidner / Renee Buxton vs Tracy Meyer / Dawn Pollack7-6, 5-1
L#1 DoublesJennifer Langtry / Nancy Cushing vs Linda Borst / Terri Whiting7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatherine Mattison vs Svetlana Petrova6-0, 6-4
W#1 DoublesMartha Davis / Nancy Cushing vs Christi Cashman / Debbie Skowron6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatherine Mattison vs Shannon Ebner6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Weidner / Ling Arenson vs Julie Boruff / Stephanie Stern1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMartha Davis / Jennifer Langtry vs Rochelle Meng / Lisa Potash6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Weidner / Ling Arenson vs Nicole Doherty / Denise Schneider2-6, 4-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAllison Goldberg / Susan Klumpner vs Chris Purcell / Nancy Manolis6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTeodora Varcheva vs Ellen Angeletti3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Cushing / Erica Eisner vs Patty Kulpins / Cheryl Jasinski6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A40W4.0 1Tam Corey Sun 11 $226019512128
2CDTA S A40W4.0 6Barrington Gray Sat 9 $245117718179
3CDTA S A40W4.0 5Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $224217719157
4CDTA S A40W4.0 4Barrington Willis Tue 7 $254215923186
5CDTA S A40W4.0 7MT Bann Coy Tue 6:30 $2733131125194
6CDTA S A40W4.0 9Hinsdale Cashman Tue 6:30 $2233121226200
7CDTA S A40W4.0 2Tam Lund Thu 7 $223391533221
8CDTA S A40W4.0 10Glenbrook Hans Sat 10 $252491532232
9CDTA S A40W4.0 8Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $251581633215
10CDTA S A40W4.0 11Forest View Hayashida Mon 7 $231571737241
11CDTA S A40W4.0 3River Trails Jasinski Tue 7 $261561838243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Jennifer Langtry
published 4.5
4.13
Elizabeth Huffman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.93
Nancy Cushing
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Allison Goldberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Susan Klumpner
published
3.85
Silvia Kusaka
published 4
3.84
Masako Ueda
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Marilyn Tansey
published 4
3.82
Erica Eisner
published 4
3.65
Teodora Varcheva
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Julie Weidner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Maura Starshak
published 4
3.60
Ling Arenson
published 4
3.59
3.55
Martha Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Angela Hanson
published 4
3.46
Maria Lobo-Corey
published 3.5
3.41
Renee Buxton
published 4
Elizabeth Burns
published
Katherine Mattison
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Eisner + Nancy Cushing6077% games+13.7% vs expected
Martha Davis + Allison Goldberg9458% games+13.3% vs expected
Stephanie Thompson + Masako Ueda9165% games+11.6% vs expected
Susan Klumpner + Allison Goldberg6260% games+9.6% vs expected
Marilyn Tansey + Elizabeth Huffman5261% games+9.5% vs expected
Silvia Kusaka + Julie Weidner11260% games+7.5% vs expected
Renee Buxton + Julie Weidner5161% games+7.2% vs expected
Martha Davis + Jennifer Langtry25960% games+6.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jennifer Langtry
244W–109L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Elizabeth Huffman
88W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
4.13
Nancy Cushing
212W–107L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Allison Goldberg
126W–78L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
Susan Klumpner
117W–94L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Masako Ueda
156W–88L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Marilyn Tansey
216W–144L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Erica Eisner
295W–139L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Teodora Varcheva
78W–113L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Julie Weidner
146W–137L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Maura Starshak
85W–44L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Ling Arenson
54W–44L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Stephanie Thompson
146W–154L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
Martha Davis
321W–153L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Angela Hanson
103W–119L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
265W–225L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
4
Renee Buxton
133W–116L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
Elizabeth Burns
28W–40L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Mattison
44W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.