Teams

CMills-UNC

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-09vs MLong-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Caroline Sloan4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesBarbara Correal vs Casey Novak6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-01vs CGonzales-ENOSplit 11
W#2 SinglesErin Berliner vs Halle Amick6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJennifer Gates-Foster vs Cecilia Gonzales4-6, 4-6
2025-06-17vs JMyers-CHCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Meghan Burns2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesLeslie Heymann vs Julie Myers4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-06-10vs KMcWhorter-ENOLost 01
L#3 SinglesErin Berliner vs Kim McWhorter0-6, 4-6
2025-06-04vs TPrinstein-HRWon 10
W#2 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Tina Prinstein6-3, 6-1
2025-06-03vs SBartle-ENOWon 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer Gates-Foster vs Liz Schaller7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-22vs ETurner-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesJennifer Gates-Foster vs Adrianne Charleston1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLeslie Heymann vs Colleen Cowperthwait6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-06vs MLong2-ENOWon 30
W#1 SinglesErin Berliner vs Lizzy Burch6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLeslie Heymann vs Lauren Kane6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBarbara Correal vs Youjin Jang6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Courtney Mills
published 3
3.16
Rebekah Farris
published
2.99
Leslie Heymann
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.94
Barbara Correal
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Julia Haslett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.87
Erin Berliner
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.76
Jennifer Gates-Foster
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.68
Meghan Fulton
published
2.59
Ashlee Hicks
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebekah Farris + Courtney Mills3456% games+2.8% vs expected
Courtney Mills + Leslie Heymann5168% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Gates-Foster + Leslie Heymann314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Courtney Mills
23W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.34
Rebekah Farris
26W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Leslie Heymann
60W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Barbara Correal
26W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Julia Haslett
47W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Erin Berliner
57W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Jennifer Gates-Foster
56W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Meghan Fulton
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Ashlee Hicks
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%27%73%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.