Teams

KMcWhorter-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-08vs MLong2-ENOWon 30
W#1 SinglesAmber Jarvis vs Penny Kraft6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRagini Singh vs Xian Zhang6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLora Alkhawam vs Whitney Maxwell6-0, 6-0
2025-07-01vs MLong-CCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Liz Morris6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAmber Jarvis vs Carolyn Krisko6-3, 6-0
2025-06-17vs MLong-ENOWon 30
W#1 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Kelsey Mortimore7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLora Alkhawam vs Taylor Montague6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Casey Novak6-1, 6-4
2025-06-10vs CMills-UNCWon 30
W#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Rebekah Farris6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Courtney Mills6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Erin Berliner6-0, 6-4
2025-06-03vs JMyers-CHCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Meghan Burns6-1, 6-4
2025-05-20vs ETurner-ENOWon 30
W#1 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Colleen Cowperthwait6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Ellie Turner7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRagini Singh vs Emily Michelman6-2, 6-0
2025-05-13vs GLoFrese-ENOWon 30
W#1 SinglesAmber Jarvis vs Kellianne White7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Leslie Jackson6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Christina Pipkin6-2, 6-3
2025-05-06vs SBartle-ENOWon 10
W#1 SinglesLora Alkhawam vs Marta Robertson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Kim McWhorter
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Lora Alkhawam
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Amber Jarvis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Ragini Singh
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Kelly Travis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim McWhorter + Loralie Bible9265% games+4.8% vs expected
Kim McWhorter + Lora Alkhawam10266% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim McWhorter
223W–79L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Lora Alkhawam
88W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Amber Jarvis
90W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Ragini Singh
94W–47L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Kelly Travis
20W–25L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.