Teams

Team 1 Sledgehammers

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.08 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-26vs Team 13 Chicks of the Night.Split 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Christian / Suzanne Marisa vs Nancy Adkins / Erin Green6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTamara Ashford / Jennifer Cirenza vs Melissa Laskin / Kate Wesley6-4, 1-3
2023-03-19vs Team 12 Top SpinnersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Christian / Suzanne Marisa vs Carolyn Greis / Anita Wilson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Cirenza / Eva Domotorffy vs Julian Myers Benton / Autumn Conrad4-6, 1-6
2023-03-12vs Team 7Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Barnes / Jennifer Cirenza vs ELIZABETH DELANEY / Kate Clancey1-6, 2-6
2023-02-26vs Team 4 Smack That AceLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Christian / Suzanne Marisa vs Yolanda Alexander / Spoorti Dandridge6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTamara Ashford / Karen Barnes vs Ami Chastain / Sharon Tompkins6-7, 3-3
2023-02-19vs Team 14Won 10
W#2 DoublesTamara Ashford / Jennifer Cirenza vs Claris Brock / Karen Coady6-4, 5-3
2023-01-23vs Team 5 Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Marisa vs Liqing Zhang3-6, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Dana Moss
published 4.5
3.81
Eva Domotorffy
published 4
3.75
Suzanne Marisa
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.67
Jennifer Cirenza
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Tamara Ashford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Melissa Hampton
published
3.60
Kristin Reif
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Ashford + Melissa Hampton1448% games−8.2% vs expected
Tamara Ashford + Jennifer Cirenza1540% gamesnot enough data
Tamara Ashford + Suzanne Marisa134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Moss
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Eva Domotorffy
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Suzanne Marisa
51W–61L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Jennifer Cirenza
25W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Tamara Ashford
35W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.67
Melissa Hampton
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Elizabeth Lucchesi
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Kristin Reif
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.