Teams

Team 4 Smack That Ace

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-30vs Team 10 Net NutsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmi Chastain / Caitlin Levanson vs Renee Wall / Kristen Schopp6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-13vs Team 14Won 20
W#1 DoublesKay Bransford / Joanne Guerrera vs PAULA SMITH / Tynika Wilson6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCindy Zettersten / Erin Gorman vs Serena Brown / Emily Covington7-6, 1-0
2023-03-04vs Team 13 Chicks of the Night.Lost 01
L#2 DoublesYolanda Alexander / Spoorti Dandridge vs Blair Reid / Stephanie Anderson2-6, 4-6
2023-02-26vs Team 1 SledgehammersWon 30
W#1 DoublesYolanda Alexander / Spoorti Dandridge vs Karen Christian / Suzanne Marisa1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMargarita Baldwin vs Dana Moss6-4, 4-2
W#2 DoublesAmi Chastain / Sharon Tompkins vs Tamara Ashford / Karen Barnes7-6, 3-3
2023-02-19vs Team 11 Net StalkersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKay Bransford / Joanne Guerrera vs Roxana Schwenk / Kerry Murray7-6, 4-1
2023-01-31vs Team 3Won 10
W#2 DoublesCindy Zettersten / Erin Gorman vs Wendy Carvajal / Bridget Costigan6-0, 6-3
2023-01-23vs Team 2Won 20
W#1 DoublesYolanda Alexander / Spoorti Dandridge vs Susan Oswald / Carolyn Loveng7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMargarita Baldwin / Ami Chastain vs LeighAnn Jackson / Lisa Karlisch6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Margarita Baldwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.96
Amy Hafey
published 4
3.94
Joanne Guerrera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Kim Miller
published
3.80
Greta Davies
published 4
3.79
Sharon Tompkins
published
3.76
Yolanda Alexander
published
3.75
Spoorti Dandridge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carrie Alfalaij
published 4
Cindy Zettersten
published 4
3.74
Caitlin Levanson
published 4
3.74
Kay Bransford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Erin Gorman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Arial Pegues
published 4
3.38
Ami Chastain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Kathleen Jeffers
published
Susan Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Miller + Margarita Baldwin6263% games+1.6% vs expected
Kay Bransford + Joanne Guerrera614053% games−0.7% vs expected
Erin Gorman + Ami Chastain6356% gamesnot enough data
Erin Gorman + Joanne Guerrera123 matchesnot enough data
Kay Bransford + Ami Chastain123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Margarita Baldwin
449W–127L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Amy Hafey
98W–55L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Joanne Guerrera
112W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
Kim Miller
42W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Greta Davies
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Sharon Tompkins
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
Yolanda Alexander
22W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Spoorti Dandridge
82W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Carrie Alfalaij
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cindy Zettersten
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Caitlin Levanson
20W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Kay Bransford
304W–204L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Erin Gorman
87W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Arial Pegues
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Ami Chastain
137W–98L career · 3 lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.38
Kathleen Jeffers
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Thompson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.