Teams

Team 3

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.86 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-30vs Team 11 Net StalkersLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Carvajal / Jeanne Baily vs Kerry Murray / Beth Sepulveda3-6, 6-7
2023-03-26vs Team 12 Top SpinnersLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Carvajal / Katrin Elliott vs Christine Ferry / Ayaka Murphy1-6, 1-6
2023-03-19vs Team 14Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTerri Pearson / Jeanne Baily vs Carrie Anderson / Dannielle Freeman6-7, 2-4
L#2 DoublesWendy Carvajal / Carol Druzbick vs PAULA SMITH / Tynika Wilson4-6, 5-6
2023-03-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Pearson / Carol Druzbick vs Heather Huling / Josette Aevermann6-4, 4-3
2023-03-11vs Team 5 Sassy SmashersWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Carvajal / Terri Pearson vs Melinda MacDonald / Jayne Deckwitz6-2, 6-3
2023-03-05vs Team 1 SledgehammersWon 10
W#1 DoublesElba Morales / Carol Druzbick vs Karen Christian / Elizabeth Lucchesi6-3, 6-2
2023-02-20vs Team 2Won 20
W#1 DoublesJeanne Baily / Jill Poretz vs Lisa Karlisch / LeighAnn Jackson7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Druzbick / Wendy Carvajal vs Stephanie Elsheikh / Kate Coler6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-31vs Team 4 Smack That AceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJill Poretz / Jeanne Baily vs Carrie Alfalaij / Kathleen Jeffers6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Carvajal / Bridget Costigan vs Cindy Zettersten / Erin Gorman0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bridget Costigan
published 4
Elba Morales
published 4
3.74
Jeanne Baily
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Carol Druzbick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Jill Poretz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Alexis Martin
published 3.5
3.21
Wendy Carvajal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Terri Pearson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Poretz + Jeanne Baily472755% games+1.9% vs expected
Wendy Carvajal + Carol Druzbick2545% games−11.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridget Costigan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Elba Morales
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Jeanne Baily
339W–236L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Carol Druzbick
114W–102L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Jill Poretz
305W–215L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Alexis Martin
24W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Wendy Carvajal
44W–106L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
Terri Pearson
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.