Teams

Team 14

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-26vs Team 7Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Moore / Claris Brock vs Kate Clancey / Suzanne Stroup2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKim Chamberlain vs Diane Fletcher3-6, 3-4
2023-03-23vs Team 10 Net NutsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMargaret Rubin / Kim Chamberlain vs Brendy Hantzes / Josette Aevermann6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesClaris Brock vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-19vs Team 13 Chicks of the Night.Split 11
L#1 DoublesKim Chamberlain / Carrie Anderson vs Nancy Scully / Cara Holtmann2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesClaris Brock vs Brenda Clark6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-19vs Team 3Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Anderson / Dannielle Freeman vs Terri Pearson / Jeanne Baily7-6, 4-2
2023-03-06vs Team 2Split 11
L#1 DoublesCarrie Anderson / Dannielle Freeman vs Lisa Karlisch / Susan Oswald0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesClaris Brock vs Michelle Tuffin7-5, 4-3
2023-02-19vs Team 1 SledgehammersLost 01
L#2 DoublesClaris Brock / Karen Coady vs Tamara Ashford / Jennifer Cirenza4-6, 3-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Dannielle Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
PAULA SMITH
published
3.68
Tynika Wilson
published
3.55
Kim Chamberlain
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.46
Claris Brock
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Margaret Rubin
published
Carrie Anderson
published 3.5
Emily Covington
published 3.5
Michelle Moore
published
Serena Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PAULA SMITH + Tynika Wilson201850% games+1.2% vs expected
Claris Brock + Dannielle Freeman4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dannielle Freeman
126W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.94
PAULA SMITH
48W–32L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Tynika Wilson
22W–23L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Kim Chamberlain
139W–119L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Claris Brock
420W–275L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
Margaret Rubin
16W–30L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
Carrie Anderson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Emily Covington
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Moore
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Serena Brown
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.