Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM3.0B

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesGlenn Mcbee / Cliff Johnson vs Patrick Wong / Balaji Venkataraman3-6, 3-6
2022-03-12vs BAY TREES PK 40AM3.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesCliff Johnson / Steve Shoaf vs Scott Yee / Ryan Rooker6-4, 6-4
2022-02-07vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.0BLost 01
L#1 SinglesCliff Johnson vs Sampath Velupula1-0
2022-01-27Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCliff Johnson vs Steve Chapman4-6, 1-6
2022-01-23vs DIAMOND HILLS 40AM3.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesCliff Johnson / Paul David vs Eduardo Zerbini / Dennis Azevedo6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCliff Johnson vs Chandra Mundra7-6, 7-5
2022-01-08vs LAFAYETTE TC 40AM3.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesEdgar Hawkyard / Cliff Johnson vs Edward Shaffer / William McCormack6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Cliff Johnson
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.11
Joseph Momich
published
3.00
Bob Koury
published 3
2.99
Mark Keeling
published
2.87
LOUIS CASTANEDA
published
2.81
Phillip Johnson
published
2.80
Glenn Mcbee
published 3
2.75
Eric Wall
published 3
2.73
David Loetz
published 3
2.72
Paul David
published
2.71
Edgar Hawkyard
published 3
2.55
Rich Overby
published
2.54
Bob Satcher
published 3
1.88
Alan Roth
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edgar Hawkyard + LOUIS CASTANEDA134 matchesnot enough data
Paul David + LOUIS CASTANEDA213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cliff Johnson
39W–26L career · 7 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Joseph Momich
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.11
3
Bob Koury
47W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Mark Keeling
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
2.99
LOUIS CASTANEDA
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
Phillip Johnson
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Glenn Mcbee
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Eric Wall
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
David Loetz
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Paul David
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Edgar Hawkyard
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
Rich Overby
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
Bob Satcher
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Alan Roth
1W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.