Teams

Sterling Oaks / Globerman

2025 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-04vs Village Walk Bonita / IversonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLynn Cifonelli / Camille Globerman vs Ann Hathaway / Joan Dilkey6-3, 7-6
2025-01-27vs Colliers Reserve / TellerLost 01
L#2 DoublesLois Hanley / Anne Pauls vs Nancy Schultz / Mary Taylor3-6, 6-7
2025-01-20vs Village Walk Bonita / IversonWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynn Cifonelli / Camille Globerman vs Ellen Iverson / Vicki MacE6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Cheryl Schroer
published 3.5
3.08
Camille Globerman
published 3.5
2.90
Anne Pauls
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Ann Johnston
published 3.5
Gail Lockyer
published
Ilene Flack
published
Kathleen Donnalley
published
Katie Neuman
published
Lois Hanley
published
Lynn Cifonelli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Piper Crawford
published
Tobi Weinstein
published
Val Bischof
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Globerman + Lois Hanley3454% gamesnot enough data
Ann Johnston + Ilene Flack134 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Donnalley + Val Bischof134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Schroer
12W–23L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Camille Globerman
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
3
Anne Pauls
43W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3.5
Ann Johnston
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.85
Gail Lockyer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ilene Flack
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Donnalley
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Neuman
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lois Hanley
24W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Cifonelli
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Piper Crawford
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tobi Weinstein
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Val Bischof
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.