Teams

MSIL 7.0 Mixed 40&O Brown-Champaign

2023 MSIL Mixed 40 & Over -West League · West MSIL 40 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesKai Wang / Molly McMahon vs Rick McKirahan / Laura Boualavong5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Sikora / Jill Reynen vs Sean Miller / Celeste Ames1-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesMolly McMahon / Kai Wang vs Jan Dickerson / Hugo Feugen7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCharles Sikora / Jill Reynen vs Dusty McEwen / Joseph McCarron3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCharles Sikora / Molly McMahon vs Kevin VanMeter / Cynthia Ottemann4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEric Ward / Renee Brown vs Tim Dasenbrock / Rebecca Vanmeter0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Kurtz / Beth Hoag vs Robert Vanhootegem / Celeste Ames2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesKai Wang / Molly McMahon vs Todd Kettering / Dusty McEwen6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEric Ward / Renee Brown vs Joseph McCarron / Jan Dickerson5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Kurtz / Beth Hoag vs Ravi Singhal / Michele Kendall1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesEric Ward / Molly McMahon vs Jan Dickerson / Craig Conway2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Brown / Steve Mertens vs Dusty McEwen / Hugo Feugen4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJill Reynen / Jeff Kurtz vs Michele Kendall / Ravi Singhal1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesEric Ward / Jill Reynen vs Tod Nicholls / Sally Boland3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Mertens / Molly McMahon vs Robert Vanhootegem / Celeste Ames2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for West MSIL 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Beth Hoag
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Molly McMahon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Charles Sikora
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jill Reynen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Steve Mertens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Ward
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jeff Kurtz
published
Kai Wang
published
Renee Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Reynen + Charles Sikora123 matchesnot enough data
Renee Brown + Charles Sikora123 matchesnot enough data
Beth Hoag + Kai Wang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Hoag
60W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Molly McMahon
38W–82L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Charles Sikora
42W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Jill Reynen
69W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Steve Mertens
13W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.88
Eric Ward
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Kurtz
1W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kai Wang
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renee Brown
18W–29L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.