Teams

MSIL 7.0 Mixed 40&O Vanhootegem-Decatur

2023 MSIL Mixed 40 & Over -West League · West MSIL 40 & Over 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesTim Dasenbrock / Cynthia Ottemann vs Jeff Kurtz / Renee Brown6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRick McKirahan / Laura Boualavong vs Kai Wang / Molly McMahon7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSean Miller / Celeste Ames vs Charles Sikora / Jill Reynen6-1, 7-5
W#1 DoublesTod Nicholls / Sally Boland vs Dusty McEwen / Todd Kettering6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Vanhootegem / Celeste Ames vs Allison Cooper / Joseph McCarron6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKevin VanMeter / Cynthia Ottemann vs Charles Sikora / Molly McMahon6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTim Dasenbrock / Rebecca Vanmeter vs Eric Ward / Renee Brown6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Vanhootegem / Celeste Ames vs Jeff Kurtz / Beth Hoag6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesSally Boland / Kevin VanMeter vs Todd Kettering / Jan Dickerson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTim Dasenbrock / Rebecca Vanmeter vs Joseph McCarron / Allison Cooper6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesRobert Vanhootegem / Celeste Ames vs Todd Kettering / Dusty McEwen2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTod Nicholls / Sally Boland vs Hugo Feugen / Jan Dickerson6-3, 6-0
W#1 DoublesTod Nicholls / Sally Boland vs Eric Ward / Jill Reynen6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Vanhootegem / Celeste Ames vs Steve Mertens / Molly McMahon6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for West MSIL 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Rebecca Vanmeter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Robert Vanhootegem
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Cynthia Ottemann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Sally Boland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.67
Celeste Ames
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Janet Hogan
published
Kevin VanMeter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Boualavong
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Rick McKirahan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Dasenbrock
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Tod Nicholls
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celeste Ames + Robert Vanhootegem161949% games−5.8% vs expected
Sally Boland + Robert Vanhootegem101247% games−12.0% vs expected
Sally Boland + Tod Nicholls18760% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Vanmeter + Kevin VanMeter4547% gamesnot enough data
Janet Hogan + Tim Dasenbrock4253% gamesnot enough data
Sally Boland + Kevin VanMeter4160% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Vanmeter + Robert Vanhootegem1438% gamesnot enough data
Tim Dasenbrock + Rebecca Vanmeter314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rebecca Vanmeter
66W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
3.5
Robert Vanhootegem
95W–110L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.75
3.5
Cynthia Ottemann
133W–110L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Sally Boland
161W–128L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Celeste Ames
55W–55L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
Janet Hogan
38W–32L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin VanMeter
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Laura Boualavong
87W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rick McKirahan
28W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Tim Dasenbrock
35W–18L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tod Nicholls
45W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.