Teams

Druid Hills (Jill Labanauskas)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)

10 players · average NTRP 2.93 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-01-05vs Druid Hills (Heather Scribner)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesRisha Doster / Hallie Meushaw vs Sara Eichelberger / Callie Barron6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAubrey Sabala vs Tara Arnold6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnna Callaway / Marissa Loomis vs Heather Scribner / Joleen Hillius3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRisha Doster / Jill Labanauskas vs Morgan King / Khette Plyler6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmina Chase vs Ashley Hamilton3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAubrey Sabala / Hallie Meushaw vs Chelsea Mautz / Stephanie McDonald6-1, 6-2
2022-12-08vs GAC (Joi Fairell)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesRisha Doster / Audrey Critz vs Annabelle Townsend / Juhua Han7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJill Labanauskas vs Joanne Harris2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Farhang / Brit StClair vs Debbie Butler / Alex Ogletree6-2, 6-3
2022-12-01vs Druid Hills (Heather Scribner)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesBrit StClair / Audrey Critz vs Leah Humphries / Sara Eichelberger6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAubrey Sabala vs Tara Arnold6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Farhang / Marissa Loomis vs Katie Baddour / Shelby Brennan3-6, 7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAudrey Critz / Aubrey Sabala vs Morgan King / Mary Catherine Bruce6-0, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAnna Callaway vs Khette Plyler2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMarissa Loomis / Brit StClair vs Katherine Lowrey / Lane Sucher6-3, 6-2
2022-11-10vs GAC (Joi Fairell)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHallie Meushaw / Amina Chase vs Annabelle Townsend / Addelynn Linton6-4, 2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Callaway / Alexandra Farhang vs Debby Tozzi / Debbie Butler0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Doublegate (Fabienne Boy)*60171588
2USTA Atlanta/Kim Cowan601627111
3White Columns (Jaime Duke)*5112614160
4Druid Hills (Jill Labanauskas)*5110816149
5GAC (Joi Fairell)*4212613127
6Lost Forrest (Leigh Stewart Blum)*4211716137
7Atlanta AC (Sara Wakefield)*3310817158
8Wexford (Lauren Brown)*3310818163
9Brookfield CC (Laura Legg)*339918154
10Dunwoody CC (Kari Lysse)*339919162
11Fieldstone (Anna Harrison)*339919184
12River Club (Laura Burmham)*339920170
13EE Robinson (Jin Hahn)*2481022192
14Capital City Club (Cynthia Zagoria)*2481022186
15White Columns (Kelly Hamm)*2481022188
16Milton RC (Stacey Lewis)*2471124202
17CC of Roswell (Samantha Carme)*2451326185
18Druid Hills (Heather Scribner)*1561227190
19Dunwoody CC (Larkie Post)*1551328194
20Governors Towne Club (Sara Kemp)*0601836216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Risha Doster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Audrey Critz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Brit StClair
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Aubrey Sabala
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Hallie Meushaw
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Jill Labanauskas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Amina Chase
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.52
Alexandra Farhang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Anna Callaway
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.19
Marissa Loomis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Risha Doster + Jill Labanauskas10360% games+9.1% vs expected
Hallie Meushaw + Audrey Critz6264% games+8.9% vs expected
Hallie Meushaw + Aubrey Sabala4159% games+7.8% vs expected
Alexandra Farhang + Brit StClair6356% games+4.7% vs expected
Risha Doster + Audrey Critz4167% gamesnot enough data
Risha Doster + Aubrey Sabala123 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Critz + Aubrey Sabala213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Risha Doster
28W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Audrey Critz
29W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Brit StClair
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Aubrey Sabala
32W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Hallie Meushaw
24W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
Jill Labanauskas
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Amina Chase
14W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Alexandra Farhang
9W–13L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Anna Callaway
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marissa Loomis
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.