Teams

Atlanta AC (Sara Wakefield)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)

19 players · average NTRP 2.71 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-01-05vs EE Robinson (Jin Hahn)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMegan Wakefield / Tara Shaia vs Hyeonggyeong Ham / Yookyung Hur7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJulie Townsend vs EJ Cheon3-6, 6-2, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Robb / Teresa Oleary vs Juyeon LEE / Mijung Park3-6, 6-4, 1-6
L#1 DoublesSara Wakefield / Karen Gipson vs Amruta Kirtane / Manisha Pandey7-6, 2-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMary-Stokes Koller vs Wenji Luo6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLucy Gray / Ginny Moody vs Jasmine Jiang / Yurong Kao7-6, 6-7, 5-7
2022-12-12vs River Club (Laura Burmham)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHelen Haberstroh / Amy Morin vs Aileen Dias / Laura Burnham2-6, 6-4, 2-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Sigler vs Barbara Dominguez5-7, 4-6
2022-12-01vs EE Robinson (Jin Hahn)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesHelen Haberstroh / Karen Gipson vs Hailee Lee / Yookyung Hur6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSara Wakefield vs EJ Cheon6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlicia Brooks / Amy Morin vs Heejung Kim / Mijung Park3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMary-Stokes Koller / Lisha Stokes vs Melody Parker / Suzanne Sarkady6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSara Wakefield vs Wenwen Yu6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Bardi / Angie Davis vs Stephanie Lozano / Lisa Chung6-4, 2-6, 6-0
2022-11-10vs River Club (Laura Burmham)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesAngie Davis / Lisha Stokes vs Shalini Broderick / Seung Judy Rodriguez6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesStephanie Sigler vs Barbara Dominguez2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Oleary / Megan Wakefield vs Lisa Menocal / Laura Burnham6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Doublegate (Fabienne Boy)*60171588
2USTA Atlanta/Kim Cowan601627111
3White Columns (Jaime Duke)*5112614160
4Druid Hills (Jill Labanauskas)*5110816149
5GAC (Joi Fairell)*4212613127
6Lost Forrest (Leigh Stewart Blum)*4211716137
7Atlanta AC (Sara Wakefield)*3310817158
8Wexford (Lauren Brown)*3310818163
9Brookfield CC (Laura Legg)*339918154
10Dunwoody CC (Kari Lysse)*339919162
11Fieldstone (Anna Harrison)*339919184
12River Club (Laura Burmham)*339920170
13EE Robinson (Jin Hahn)*2481022192
14Capital City Club (Cynthia Zagoria)*2481022186
15White Columns (Kelly Hamm)*2481022188
16Milton RC (Stacey Lewis)*2471124202
17CC of Roswell (Samantha Carme)*2451326185
18Druid Hills (Heather Scribner)*1561227190
19Dunwoody CC (Larkie Post)*1551328194
20Governors Towne Club (Sara Kemp)*0601836216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Sara Wakefield
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Julie Townsend
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.81
Mary-Stokes Koller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Angie Davis
published 3
2.72
Helen Haberstroh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Stephanie Sigler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.69
Tara Shaia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Heather Bardi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Karen Gipson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Megan Wakefield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Alicia Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Lisha Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Danielle Robb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ginny Moody
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.22
Amy Morin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.02
Teresa Oleary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
Kathy Strickland
published
Cheryl Crouch
published
Lucy Gray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Shaia + Julie Townsend6358% games+18.1% vs expected
Teresa Oleary + Lucy Gray4351% games+9.0% vs expected
Teresa Oleary + Amy Morin2347% games+4.3% vs expected
Tara Shaia + Heather Bardi3548% games+2.5% vs expected
Karen Gipson + Helen Haberstroh71247% games+0.6% vs expected
Kathy Strickland + Teresa Oleary0724% games−6.1% vs expected
Kathy Strickland + Karen Gipson044 matchesnot enough data
Mary-Stokes Koller + Sara Wakefield314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Wakefield
46W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
Julie Townsend
30W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
Mary-Stokes Koller
25W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Angie Davis
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Helen Haberstroh
21W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Stephanie Sigler
16W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.72
Tara Shaia
24W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Heather Bardi
17W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Karen Gipson
17W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
Megan Wakefield
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%76%24%
2.41
2.5
Alicia Brooks
12W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
0%94%6%
2.29
Lisha Stokes
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Danielle Robb
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Ginny Moody
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Amy Morin
6W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.22
Teresa Oleary
14W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Kathy Strickland
10W–36L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Cheryl Crouch
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lucy Gray
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.