Teams

Lost Forrest (Leigh Stewart Blum)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-01-05vs Saddle Creek (Lindsey Shannon)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Evans / Lauren Surden vs Kathy Brennan / Katie Replogle6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSayaka Onishi vs Melissa MacHit6-4, 4-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeather Surdick / Lyuba Hubbs vs Ellen Hake / Lindsey Shannon3-6, 0-6
2022-12-15vs Governors Towne Club (Sara Kemp)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Surdick / Nicole Evans vs Christy Maddox / Sara Kemp6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLeigh Stewart Blum vs Jill Howell6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSayaka Onishi / Lyuba Hubbs vs Kensey Mimbs / Charlie Freeman6-0, 6-0
2022-12-08vs Wexford (Lauren Brown)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Worly / Tabitha Rahn vs Lauren Brown / Brandy Baugham6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKaz Beckerman vs Kate Barton2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLeigh Stewart Blum / Heather Surdick vs Jennifer Gold / Ensley Nesbitt6-0, 6-2
2022-12-01vs USTA Atlanta/Kim CowanLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeigh Stewart Blum / Julie Worly vs Kim Cowan / Jenna Partisano-Vyas5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKaz Beckerman vs Kacey Rogers7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHeather Surdick / Lauren Edelstein vs JENNIFER ONEILL / Michele Bauserman0-6, 1-6
2022-11-17vs Brookfield CC (Laura Legg)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesHeather Surdick / Lyuba Hubbs vs Sascha Chaney / Sara Maurer3-6, 7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKaz Beckerman vs Christa Scardina2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Worly / Karen Kelleher vs Ashley Shandor / Emma Dyer5-7, 3-6
2022-11-10vs Saddle Creek (Lindsey Shannon)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesLeigh Stewart Blum / Tabitha Rahn vs Kathy Brennan / Melissa MacHit6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLauren Surden vs Leigh Lanier3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSayaka Onishi / Lyuba Hubbs vs Jenni Johnson / Kristi Flannagan6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings20 teams · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Doublegate (Fabienne Boy)*60171588
2USTA Atlanta/Kim Cowan601627111
3White Columns (Jaime Duke)*5112614160
4Druid Hills (Jill Labanauskas)*5110816149
5GAC (Joi Fairell)*4212613127
6Lost Forrest (Leigh Stewart Blum)*4211716137
7Atlanta AC (Sara Wakefield)*3310817158
8Wexford (Lauren Brown)*3310818163
9Brookfield CC (Laura Legg)*339918154
10Dunwoody CC (Kari Lysse)*339919162
11Fieldstone (Anna Harrison)*339919184
12River Club (Laura Burmham)*339920170
13EE Robinson (Jin Hahn)*2481022192
14Capital City Club (Cynthia Zagoria)*2481022186
15White Columns (Kelly Hamm)*2481022188
16Milton RC (Stacey Lewis)*2471124202
17CC of Roswell (Samantha Carme)*2451326185
18Druid Hills (Heather Scribner)*1561227190
19Dunwoody CC (Larkie Post)*1551328194
20Governors Towne Club (Sara Kemp)*0601836216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Heather Surdick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.04
Julie Worly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Sayaka Onishi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.91
Tabitha Rahn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Kaz Beckerman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Leigh Stewart Blum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Lyuba Hubbs
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Karen Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Edelstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Surden
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Worly + Tabitha Rahn8260% games+9.7% vs expected
Heather Surdick + Lyuba Hubbs2343% games+0.1% vs expected
Leigh Stewart Blum + Lauren Surden4353% games−3.7% vs expected
Sayaka Onishi + Lyuba Hubbs404 matchesnot enough data
Heather Surdick + Lauren Edelstein033 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Stewart Blum + Julie Worly213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Heather Surdick
30W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.07
Julie Worly
24W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Sayaka Onishi
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
Tabitha Rahn
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Kaz Beckerman
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87
Leigh Stewart Blum
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
Lyuba Hubbs
20W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Karen Kelleher
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.41
Lauren Edelstein
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Surden
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.