Teams

TOC.Jones

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-27vs PW.KupfrianLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Liddle / Jacqueline Morgan vs Sarah van Saun / Ruth Dobson-Torres4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLynelle Clark / Julie Karg vs Allison Kupfrian / Kimberly Roda6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarie Gelston / Byerly Graves vs Jennifer Smith / Patti Hulbert6-2, 6-4
2026-08-20vs PW.OttWon 30
W#1 DoublesVanese Clough / Marie Gelston vs Isabella Griffa / Marta Keyser6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesOlga Stephens / Jacqueline Morgan vs Rosalind Manning / Amy Munn6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnna Jones / Byerly Graves vs Hollis Mertens / Melissa Penabad7-5, 6-3
2026-08-13vs TOC.SagerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Karg / Rachel Pisciotta vs Nelda VanAarde / Anne Farmer6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesOlga Stephens / Lynelle Clark vs Valerie Dorrier / Angki Sager6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnna Jones / Byerly Graves vs Holly Haney / Kelly Polizzi6-7, 2-6
2026-08-06vs ANP.KeelorWon 30
W#1 DoublesVanese Clough / Lynelle Clark vs Leslie Roper / Jamie Hinckley6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Pisciotta / Julie Karg vs Michele Mulcahy / Kelly Felten6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesOlga Stephens / Byerly Graves vs Patricia Batuna / Gina Jiampetti6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Jones3081354
2ANP.Lowrance2042446
3MCP.Fukuzawa2163772
4TOC.Sager2163774
5MD.Merchant2163872
6TOC.Slaymaker1030016
7ACP.Baldyga1021230
8PW.Arndts1030328
9TOC.Derks1021321
10PW.Ott1133652
11TOC.Grasser1133762
12ACP.Murphy0112426
13TOC.Pannell0103634
14PW.Jacobsen0103634
15ANP.Keelor031816107

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Olga Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Vanese Clough
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Neepa Patel
published
3.18
Rachel Pisciotta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Julie Liddle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Julie Karg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Jacqueline Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Marie Gelston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Lynelle Clark
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Byerly Graves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Karg + Julie Liddle10950% games−3.4% vs expected
Byerly Graves + Olga Stephens9651% games−4.2% vs expected
Julie Karg + Lynelle Clark14556% gamesnot enough data
Julie Liddle + Vanese Clough11368% gamesnot enough data
Lynelle Clark + Julie Liddle3550% gamesnot enough data
Lynelle Clark + Olga Stephens5162% gamesnot enough data
Julie Liddle + Olga Stephens4257% gamesnot enough data
Marie Gelston + Vanese Clough3353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Olga Stephens
231W–106L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Vanese Clough
173W–150L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Neepa Patel
19W–18L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Rachel Pisciotta
108W–84L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Julie Liddle
216W–149L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Julie Karg
145W–136L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Jacqueline Morgan
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Marie Gelston
215W–160L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Lynelle Clark
152W–137L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Byerly Graves
70W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.