Teams

TOC.Grasser

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-30vs PW.BologaWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Beck / Celina Morice vs Leslie McAulay / Erika Lipkin6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKeely Williams / Regina Davis vs Angela Newman / Kristin Comer7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoanna Hooten / Yvonne Acker vs Erin Schneider / Helen Bologa7-6, 6-3
2026-08-22vs TOC.BarcinasWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Beck / Celina Morice vs Lauren Triebert / Suzanne Ruggles6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Newson / Regina Davis vs Catie Cunningham / Bracha Blanc6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJoanna Hooten / Keely Williams vs Andrea Desonglo / Smita Shukla6-3, 6-3
2026-08-08vs ANP.LowranceLost 12
L#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Tracy Grasser vs Dianna White / Stacey Stephens4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Newson / Yvonne Acker vs Corinna Proctor / Karen Johnston6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSharon Fadelici / Sharon Herschman vs Tracy Lowrance / Lisa Brandman6-7, 5-7
2026-08-01vs KF.ScagnelliWon 21
L#1 DoublesTracy Grasser / Ann Beck vs Kimberly Latzy / Mari Stratemeier3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesYvonne Acker / Joanna Hooten vs Carol Collins / Virginia Lewis6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Fadelici / Sharon Herschman vs Tara Navarro / Stephanie Jabusch6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Jones3081354
2ANP.Lowrance2042446
3MCP.Fukuzawa2163772
4TOC.Sager2163774
5MD.Merchant2163872
6TOC.Slaymaker1030016
7ACP.Baldyga1021230
8PW.Arndts1030328
9TOC.Derks1021321
10PW.Ott1133652
11TOC.Grasser1133762
12ACP.Murphy0112426
13TOC.Pannell0103634
14PW.Jacobsen0103634
15ANP.Keelor031816107

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Celina Morice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Regina Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Yvonne Acker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Heather Ingram
published 3
2.98
Julie Newson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Joanna Hooten
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Sharon Fadelici
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Keely Williams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Ann Beck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Tracy Grasser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Sharon Herschman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Grasser + Sharon Fadelici9855% games+3.7% vs expected
Ann Beck + Tracy Grasser5445% games−2.5% vs expected
Sharon Herschman + Tracy Grasser2448% gamesnot enough data
Keely Williams + Sharon Fadelici2344% gamesnot enough data
Celina Morice + Yvonne Acker123 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Herschman + Sharon Fadelici213 matchesnot enough data
Regina Davis + Yvonne Acker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Celina Morice
93W–79L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.35
Regina Davis
36W–56L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Yvonne Acker
128W–167L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Heather Ingram
8W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Julie Newson
70W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Joanna Hooten
77W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Sharon Fadelici
184W–140L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Keely Williams
186W–157L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Ann Beck
18W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Tracy Grasser
146W–131L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Sharon Herschman
76W–105L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.