Teams

PW.Ott

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.23 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-09-03vs MD.WadeWon 21
W#1 DoublesColleen McGowan / Isabella Griffa vs Kimberly Kenney / Shari McCandlish6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Ott / Hollis Mertens vs Kathleen Cullen / Lea Ann Baker6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCourtney Dietz / Amy Magrini vs Jennifer Locklear / Paula Bullock3-6, 1-6
2026-08-27vs TOC.FriddleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Magrini / Lysa Stylski vs Colin Liebling / Janet Constantino6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarta Keyser / Hollis Mertens vs Heather Roberts / Christine Burr2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesColleen McGowan / Amy Munn vs Stephannie Messina / Terry Friddle6-1, 7-5
2026-08-20vs TOC.JonesLost 03
L#1 DoublesIsabella Griffa / Marta Keyser vs Vanese Clough / Marie Gelston4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRosalind Manning / Amy Munn vs Olga Stephens / Jacqueline Morgan3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHollis Mertens / Melissa Penabad vs Anna Jones / Byerly Graves5-7, 3-6
2026-08-13vs PW.KupfrianWon 30
W#1 DoublesLysa Stylski / Karen Coe vs Erin Nelson / Millie Young6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRosalind Manning / Harriet Wilson vs Penny Kraft / Courtney Osman6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Ott / Isabella Griffa vs Terri Levine / Jennifer Smith6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Jones3081354
2ANP.Lowrance2042446
3MCP.Fukuzawa2163772
4TOC.Sager2163774
5MD.Merchant2163872
6TOC.Slaymaker1030016
7ACP.Baldyga1021230
8PW.Arndts1030328
9TOC.Derks1021321
10PW.Ott1133652
11TOC.Grasser1133762
12ACP.Murphy0112426
13TOC.Pannell0103634
14PW.Jacobsen0103634
15ANP.Keelor031816107

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Carole Bobby
published 3.5
3.40
Rosalind Manning
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elise Steagall
published 3.5
3.25
Colleen McGowan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.23
Hollis Mertens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Lysa Stylski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Isabella Griffa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Mary Ott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Harriet Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Karen Coe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Amy Magrini
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Melissa Penabad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Courtney Dietz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Amy Munn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Marta Keyser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lysa Stylski + Harriet Wilson6356% games+8.3% vs expected
Isabella Griffa + Colleen McGowan2349% games+2.8% vs expected
Rosalind Manning + Lysa Stylski8550% games−5.1% vs expected
Carole Bobby + Rosalind Manning91253% games−6.6% vs expected
Karen Coe + Isabella Griffa044 matchesnot enough data
Karen Coe + Lysa Stylski314 matchesnot enough data
Carole Bobby + Harriet Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ott + Hollis Mertens123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carole Bobby
186W–190L career · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Rosalind Manning
98W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Elise Steagall
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Colleen McGowan
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Hollis Mertens
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Lysa Stylski
105W–110L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Isabella Griffa
53W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
Mary Ott
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Harriet Wilson
66W–119L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Karen Coe
54W–91L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Amy Magrini
67W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
Melissa Penabad
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Courtney Dietz
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Amy Munn
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Marta Keyser
68W–123L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.