Teams

FD 6.0 NC Snyder

2025 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles

15 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 6.0 CV2 Casamento802048133
2FD 6.0 PW1 Lonsway82181225239
3FD 6.0 NC Snyder7321922220
4FD 6.0 GR Bortz64161437284
5FD 6.0 MV2 Herbruck53131124214
6FD 6.0 CC Lombardo55151533259
7FD 6.0 MV1 Carracher55161436283
8FD 6.0 PM Perkins55141636280
9FD 6.0 PW2 Merugu55131739303
10FD 6.0 TRR Dworakowski46151534258
11FD 6.0 TP1 Derrig46141635282
12FD 6.0 MV3 Wu46151537282
13FD 6.0 MM Bode46131740294
14FD 6.0 WE Woodruff35111327204
15FD 6.0 CV1 Carroll3591533245
16FD 6.0 TP2 Licari37102041309
17FD 6.0 CSC Taylor1771737251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Douglas Snyder
published 3.5
3.20
Jacqueline Snyder
published 3.5
3.16
Ryan Brahler
published
3.06
Julianne Yang
published
3.04
Jessica Trent
published
3.04
Wendi Preston
published
2.96
MICHAEL GIBSON
published
2.95
Erin Gelal
published 3
2.89
Lora Harley
published
2.84
2.60
Kathleen Fletcher
published
2.58
Chassity Pence
published 3
2.41
Christine Powell
published 2.5
Lynn Snyder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christian Kellamis + Anthony Mazzaferri224 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Snyder + Ryan Brahler314 matchesnot enough data
Julianne Yang + Jacqueline Snyder314 matchesnot enough data
Wendi Preston + Jessica Trent303 matchesnot enough data
Wendi Preston + Jacqueline Snyder033 matchesnot enough data
Lora Harley + Julianne Yang033 matchesnot enough data
Chassity Pence + Jacqueline Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Douglas Snyder
83W–46L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Jacqueline Snyder
73W–41L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Ryan Brahler
54W–26L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
Julianne Yang
69W–38L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.06
Jessica Trent
50W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04
Wendi Preston
128W–62L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
MICHAEL GIBSON
81W–67L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Erin Gelal
79W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lora Harley
53W–47L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Christian Kellamis
27W–45L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Anthony Mazzaferri
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Fletcher
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%21%79%
2.60
3
Chassity Pence
29W–33L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58
2.5
Christine Powell
14W–36L career · no lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.41
Lynn Snyder
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.