Teams

FD 6.0 MV3 Wu

2025 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 6.0 CV2 Casamento802048133
2FD 6.0 PW1 Lonsway82181225239
3FD 6.0 NC Snyder7321922220
4FD 6.0 GR Bortz64161437284
5FD 6.0 MV2 Herbruck53131124214
6FD 6.0 CC Lombardo55151533259
7FD 6.0 MV1 Carracher55161436283
8FD 6.0 PM Perkins55141636280
9FD 6.0 PW2 Merugu55131739303
10FD 6.0 TRR Dworakowski46151534258
11FD 6.0 TP1 Derrig46141635282
12FD 6.0 MV3 Wu46151537282
13FD 6.0 MM Bode46131740294
14FD 6.0 WE Woodruff35111327204
15FD 6.0 CV1 Carroll3591533245
16FD 6.0 TP2 Licari37102041309
17FD 6.0 CSC Taylor1771737251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Tao You
published
2.97
Shawn Sun
published
2.95
Yuping Wu
published
2.92
Min Cui
published
Bin Zhao
published 3
Emily Lin
published 3
Hakan Doga
published 3
2.71
MEI LI
published
2.70
Zhigang Gao
published
2.60
2.51
Kate Lawson
published
2.33
Jin Shao
published
Richard Fan
published
Robert Zhang
published
Shengqiang Gao
published
Xiaofeng Wang
published
Yuqing Gong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Lentini + Yuping Wu5260% games+15.3% vs expected
Min Cui + MEI LI6263% games+14.3% vs expected
Yuping Wu + Tao You4160% games+5.7% vs expected
Shawn Sun + Robert Zhang3255% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Lentini + Kate Lawson134 matchesnot enough data
Min Cui + Yuping Wu303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tao You
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Shawn Sun
22W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Yuping Wu
45W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Min Cui
43W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Bin Zhao
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Emily Lin
29W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Hakan Doga
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
MEI LI
49W–37L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
Zhigang Gao
21W–42L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Catherine Lentini
20W–33L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Kate Lawson
1W–17L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Jin Shao
24W–24L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
Richard Fan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Zhang
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shengqiang Gao
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Xiaofeng Wang
16W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yuqing Gong
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.