Teams

FD 6.0 MM Bode

2025 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles

17 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 6.0 CV2 Casamento802048133
2FD 6.0 PW1 Lonsway82181225239
3FD 6.0 NC Snyder7321922220
4FD 6.0 GR Bortz64161437284
5FD 6.0 MV2 Herbruck53131124214
6FD 6.0 CC Lombardo55151533259
7FD 6.0 MV1 Carracher55161436283
8FD 6.0 PM Perkins55141636280
9FD 6.0 PW2 Merugu55131739303
10FD 6.0 TRR Dworakowski46151534258
11FD 6.0 TP1 Derrig46141635282
12FD 6.0 MV3 Wu46151537282
13FD 6.0 MM Bode46131740294
14FD 6.0 WE Woodruff35111327204
15FD 6.0 CV1 Carroll3591533245
16FD 6.0 TP2 Licari37102041309
17FD 6.0 CSC Taylor1771737251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Brian Bode
published 3
2.84
Adnan Kazazic
published 3.5
2.64
karissa morcelle
published
2.63
Jean Mcnamara
published
2.62
Jeff Kazol
published
2.61
Reese Van Keuren
published
2.57
Timothy Chen
published
2.56
Chris Hagesfeld
published 3
2.48
Natalie Winer
published
2.46
Sanita Kazazic
published
2.44
Paul Boduch
published
2.43
Julia Han
published
2.37
David Bode
published 2.5
2.20
Debra Bode
published 2.5
Ernest Thivierge
published
Lincoln Osborn
published
Luke Kazmier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Bode + Sanita Kazazic6650% games−1.2% vs expected
Julia Han + Sanita Kazazic2841% games−10.2% vs expected
Jean Mcnamara + Sanita Kazazic2350% gamesnot enough data
Debra Bode + Natalie Winer044 matchesnot enough data
Debra Bode + Reese Van Keuren213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brian Bode
13W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3.5
Adnan Kazazic
106W–125L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84
karissa morcelle
16W–16L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Jean Mcnamara
16W–41L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Jeff Kazol
14W–31L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.62
Reese Van Keuren
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%22%78%
2.61
Timothy Chen
18W–47L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Chris Hagesfeld
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Natalie Winer
18W–39L career · no lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
Sanita Kazazic
68W–98L career · no lines in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
Paul Boduch
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Julia Han
39W–71L career · no lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.43
2.5
David Bode
2W–35L career · no lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Debra Bode
35W–111L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Ernest Thivierge
1W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lincoln Osborn
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Luke Kazmier
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.