Teams

IE-CCCC-Sharon Hebert

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over - IE · IE Women 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.14 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-02vs IE-LLW-TCHS-Lessley/NessLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoseann Harris / Michelle Porter vs Julie Lessley / Deborah Fitzgerald3-6, 4-6
2023-06-17vs IE-LLW-TCHS-Lessley/NessSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristie Boniface / Whitney Johnson vs Jeananne Woodman / Deborah Fitzgerald6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesShelley Mellentine / Elizabeth Knoblach vs Julie Lessley / CHARLOTTE DEHESA5-7, 2-6
2023-06-10vs IE-LLW-TCHS-Lessley/NessSplit 11
W#2 DoublesWhitney Johnson / Marites Killion vs Cristina Leivas / Cindy Stafford7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHeidi Schuler / Marico Labrado vs Becky Ness / Jane Whitney0-6, 0-6
2023-06-03vs IE-LLW-TCHS-Lessley/NessSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeidi Schuler / Nadine Arnaiz-Bradvica vs Becky Ness / Ronda Smyth3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMichelle Porter / Elizabeth Knoblach vs Becky Gagnon / Jan Ofallon6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-13vs IE-LLW-TCHS-Lessley/NessLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Porter / Heidi Schuler vs Becky Ness / Ronda Smyth3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesWhitney Johnson / Christie Boniface vs Rosemary Mireles / Deborah Fitzgerald7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRoseann Harris / Nadine Arnaiz-Bradvica vs Julie Lessley / CHARLOTTE DEHESA2-6, 2-6
2023-04-22vs IE-LLW-TCHS-Lessley/NessLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoan Greene / Elizabeth Knoblach vs Tracy Russo / Rosemary Mireles3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStacey McCoy / Marico Labrado vs Ronda Smyth / Becky Ness0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Porter / Roseann Harris vs Cristina Leivas / Cindy Stafford7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-15vs IE-LLW-TCHS-Lessley/NessWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarico Labrado / Stacey McCoy vs Cindy Stafford / Jeananne Woodman7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRoseann Harris / Michelle Porter vs Tracy Russo / Ronda Smyth6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Stacey McCoy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Heidi Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Roseann Harris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.88
Christie Boniface
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.86
Elizabeth Knoblach
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Tammy Pronenko
published
3.76
Marites Killion
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Kelly Bollmann
published 3.5
3.44
Karen Obst
published
3.26
Sharon Hebert
published
2.97
Joan Greene
published
Laura Fenton
published
Shelley Mellentine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey McCoy + Roseann Harris371658% games+4.8% vs expected
Marites Killion + Christie Boniface213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stacey McCoy
145W–88L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Heidi Schuler
117W–78L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Roseann Harris
96W–74L career · 4 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Christie Boniface
97W–88L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Elizabeth Knoblach
38W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
Tammy Pronenko
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Marites Killion
115W–68L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
3.5
Kelly Bollmann
73W–87L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
Karen Obst
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.44
Sharon Hebert
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Joan Greene
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Laura Fenton
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelley Mellentine
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.