Teams

SDNC 4.5 LLW Carmel Valley TC/ Goodson

2021 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Women - 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-26Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDorian Sailer vs Ginny Beneke5-5
2021-05-05Won 20
W#1 SinglesDorian Sailer vs Judith Bosler6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDolores Ilko / Caron Schraeder vs Lindsey Oar / Kristen Fine6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDorian Sailer vs Lisa Barthelemy6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAdria Hilsdorf / Caron Schraeder vs Kristie Alva / Teri Stevens4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-04-07vs SDNC 4.5 Morgan Run 10:30AM/ EllisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdria Hilsdorf / Britney Ewing vs Lisa Crisafulli / Robin Hubbard4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDolores Ilko / Karyn McCartney vs Laura Steenstra / Lynn Ellis6-3, 6-4
2021-03-31vs SDNC 4.5 CTA@RA 9AM/ ShintaniWon 10
W#2 DoublesDolores Ilko / Sophia Richardson vs Kathleen Gallo / Patricia Matsuoka7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesDolores Ilko / Adria Hilsdorf vs Gail Schwartz / Sarena Talbert6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDorian Sailer vs Thanh Huyen7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Dolores Ilko
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.37
Kellie Jaquez
published 4.5
4.33
Britney Ewing
published 4.5
4.29
Shelley Goodson
published
4.20
Dorian Sailer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Carol Donahue
published 4.5
4.12
Sophia Richardson
published
4.12
Adria Hilsdorf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Cynthia Delgado
published 4.5
Karyn McCartney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dolores Ilko + Kellie Jaquez4269% gamesnot enough data
Dolores Ilko + Adria Hilsdorf123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dolores Ilko
160W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
4.38
4.5
Kellie Jaquez
104W–50L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
4.37
4.5
Britney Ewing
13W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
4.33
Shelley Goodson
14W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Dorian Sailer
75W–67L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Carol Donahue
26W–15L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
4.16
Sophia Richardson
27W–31L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Adria Hilsdorf
73W–54L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Cynthia Delgado
12W–12L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
4.08
Karyn McCartney
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.