Teams

SDNC 4.5 Kit Carson Park 9AM/ Sullivan

2021 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Women - 4.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.58 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-19vs SDNC 4.5 San Dieguito 10:30AM/ HumeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristie Alva / Mary Malhame vs Lindsey Oar / Triva Bridges6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDiane Ghiron vs Allison Sterett3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBrianna Sullivan / Kristie Alva vs Sarena Talbert / Gai Zeman6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDiane Ghiron vs Catharine Conover3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-04-28vs SDNC 4.5 CTA@RA 9AM/ ShintaniWon 10
W#1 SinglesDiane Ghiron vs Tiffinie Harpster7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKristie Alva / Teri Stevens vs Adria Hilsdorf / Caron Schraeder6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDiane Ghiron vs Judith Bosler6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristie Alva / Masako Wilson vs Kelley McNaught-Davis Hess / Pam Zimbalist6-3, 7-5
2021-03-17vs SDNC 4.5 Morgan Run 10:30AM/ EllisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristie Alva / Brianna Sullivan vs Adele Psyllos / Lisa Crisafulli4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDiane Ghiron vs Vicky Wolfe6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
ERIN HUGHES
published 4.5
4.42
Kristie Alva
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.39
Brianna Sullivan
published 4.5
4.36
Mary Malhame
published 4.5
4.17
Masako Wilson
published 4.5
4.07
Diane Ghiron
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Teri Stevens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Malhame + Diane Ghiron151055% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
ERIN HUGHES
9W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
4.46
5
Kristie Alva
60W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
4.42
4.5
Brianna Sullivan
12W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Mary Malhame
48W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Masako Wilson
58W–40L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Diane Ghiron
100W–80L career · 5 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
4.07
Teri Stevens
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.