Teams

SDNC 4.5 Morgan Run 10:30AM/ Ellis

2021 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Women - 4.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesLaura Steenstra / Vicky Wolfe vs Gai Zeman / Sarena Talbert6-3, 6-0
2021-05-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Crisafulli / Adele Psyllos vs Lori Mendes / Kelly Warren7-6, 6-2
2021-04-21vs SDNC 4.5 CTA@RA 9AM/ ShintaniWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Steenstra / Stacie Hunt vs Kathleen Gallo / Tricia Johnson6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesStacie Hunt / Adele Psyllos vs Thanh Huyen / Amy Repetti0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSundi Olson / Catherine Anderson vs Catharine Conover / Sarena Talbert6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Steenstra / Lynn Ellis vs Dolores Ilko / Karyn McCartney3-6, 4-6
2021-03-31Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Steenstra / Sundi Olson vs Kristen Fine / Lindsey Oar4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-03-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSundi Olson / Vicky Wolfe vs Kelly Warren / Lori Mendes7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAdele Psyllos / Lisa Crisafulli vs Kristie Alva / Brianna Sullivan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Steenstra / Sundi Olson vs ERIN HUGHES / Michelle May6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Lisa Crisafulli
published 4.5
4.27
Laura Steenstra
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.18
Adele Psyllos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Robin Hubbard
published
3.97
Sundi Olson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.92
Stacie Hunt
published
Vicky Wolfe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Steenstra + Sundi Olson683754% games+2.5% vs expected
Lisa Crisafulli + Adele Psyllos7358% games−0.5% vs expected
Laura Steenstra + Adele Psyllos303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lisa Crisafulli
92W–59L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Laura Steenstra
168W–92L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Adele Psyllos
83W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
4.18
Robin Hubbard
14W–7L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Sundi Olson
125W–128L career · 4 lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.97
Stacie Hunt
19W–14L career · no lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
3.92
Vicky Wolfe
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.