Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0A

2026 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 5.0

13 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-14vs LOS GATOS SR 18AM5.0AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMax Liberty-Point / Brian Jacobsen vs Ken Marques / Andrew Ngo6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPalmer Mendelson / Taylor Chaparro vs Jim Cushing / Sam Behbehani7-5, 6-0
2026-06-12vs RINCONADA PK 18AM5.0BWon 30
W#1 DoublesJon Teel / Adam Luba vs Milind Badhe / Navdeep Sandhu6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPrashant Madabhushi vs Hsin Yen Chung6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAaron Klapper / Aaron Stolpman vs Anastas Budagov / Shiraz Madan6-3, 6-4
2026-06-09vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0BWon 21
W#1 DoublesMax Liberty-Point / Adam Luba vs Milind Badhe / Eric Tsai2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMatthew Thornton vs Anastas Budagov6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlexander Groth / Brian Jacobsen vs Navdeep Sandhu / Rahul Perhar4-6, 5-7
2026-06-07vs RINCONADA PK 18AM5.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Thornton / Brian Jacobsen vs Derek Fitzpatrick / Stephen Noel1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJon Teel vs Conor Holton-Burke4-6, 2-6
2026-06-03vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0BWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlexander Groth / Adam Luba vs Nghien Nguyen / Anastas Budagov6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJon Teel / Brian Jacobsen vs Alex Stolyar / Hao Chen6-2, 6-0
2026-05-17vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0BWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnthony Kerin / Adam Luba vs Juan Pablo Gonzalez / Mike Koval6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPalmer Mendelson vs Anastas Budagov6-3, 6-0
2026-05-02vs LOS GATOS SR 18AM5.0AWon 21
L#1 DoublesPrashant Madabhushi / Jon Teel vs Stephen Noel / Andrew Ngo7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTaylor Chaparro vs Ken Marques6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Jacobsen / Max Liberty-Point vs Jim Cushing / Joshua Kaye6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-23vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0BWon 21
W#1 DoublesMax Liberty-Point / Joseph Teh vs Nghien Nguyen / Juan Pablo Gonzalez6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTaylor Chaparro vs Anastas Budagov7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJon Teel / Brian Jacobsen vs Aneil Kamboj / Eric Tsai6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings25 teams · Men's 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CALIFORNIA TC 18AM5.0A9124615188
2ORINDA CC 18AM5.0A9124617217
3CUESTA TC 18AM5.0A9123719235
4BROOKSIDE 18AM5.0A8223716195
5OLYMPIC 18AM5.0A82201022182
6BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0A7119512139
7SUTTER LAWN 18AM5.0A73201025220
8SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM5.0A73201026240
9LOS GATOS SR 18AM5.0A6215919189
10SAN FRAN ST U 18AM5.0A64191125217
11WASHINGTON PK 18AM5.0A64171331252
12GOLDMAN TC 18AM5.0A55171330236
13MERVYN MORRIS PK 18AM5.0A55171331258
14FREMONT TC 18AM5.0A55151537283
15SAN PABLO PK 18AM5.0A55131738272
16RINCONADA PK 18AM5.0A55121838291
17SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM5.0C46131735261
18ST MARY 18AM5.0A46131738279
19RIO DEL ORO 18AM5.0A37102044310
20OLYMPIC 18AM5.0B1862144275
21RINCONADA PK 18AM5.0B19102044323
22ROUND HILL CC 18AM5.0A1962450330
23SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM5.0B1942654346
24NOVATO TC/PIONEER PK 18AM5.0A0912652319
25BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0B01052552343

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.74 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Anthony Kerin
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.76
Alexander Groth
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.76
Taylor Chaparro
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.75
Prashant Madabhushi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Aaron Stolpman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.74
Jon Teel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.73
Adam Luba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.70
Joseph Teh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.68
Aaron Klapper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.67
Max Liberty-Point
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.64
Brian Jacobsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
Matthew Thornton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Palmer Mendelson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Anthony Kerin
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.93
5
Alexander Groth
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.76
Taylor Chaparro
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.76
Prashant Madabhushi
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
4.75
5
Aaron Stolpman
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jon Teel
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.74
Adam Luba
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.73
Joseph Teh
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.70
5
Aaron Klapper
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
Max Liberty-Point
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Brian Jacobsen
5W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.64
Matthew Thornton
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Palmer Mendelson
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.