Teams

NOVATO TC/PIONEER PK 18AM5.0A

2026 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 5.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-07vs SAN FRAN ST U 18AM5.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesAdam Mernit / John Hackbert vs Gabe Cramer / Ryan Stark6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSeth Nobmann vs Jason Weinberg0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Mullarkey / Trevor Pinder vs Anikait Sharma / Jonathan Risos3-6, 5-7
2026-06-06vs OLYMPIC 18AM5.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Hackbert / Adam Mernit vs Paul Giraud / Arjith Jayaraman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTom Veach / Christophe Prompt vs Lance Ngo / David Orces1-6, 1-6
2026-05-30vs CALIFORNIA TC 18AM5.0ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Hackbert / David Mullarkey vs Dominic Bermudez / Qi Hao TAN6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTom Veach / Michael Saucy vs William Lyon / Colin Mark-Griffin7-5, 6-3
2026-05-17vs GOLDMAN TC 18AM5.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesRyan Smith / Trevor Pinder vs Jonathan Kim / Petr Satral2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristophe Prompt vs Daniel Harris2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Saucy / David Mullarkey vs Wesley Chen / Milad Shafaie6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-07vs OLYMPIC 18AM5.0BLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Hackbert / Ryan Smith vs James Vanreusel / Sean Dizon6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Saucy vs Bennett Gazor7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Viani / David Mullarkey vs Benjamin Quazzo / Fernando Rodriguez7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-03vs SAN FRAN ST U 18AM5.0ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Mullarkey / Joel Parrish vs Jason Weinberg / Aditya Prabhakar4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Halleck / Michael Saucy vs Marko Boskovski / Rohit Chouhan6-3, 3-4
2026-04-25vs CALIFORNIA TC 18AM5.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Hackbert / Ryan Smith vs Jas Hodzic / Ilya Gendelman3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoel Parrish / Michael Saucy vs Peter Stovell / Nicholas Andrews2-6, 4-6
2026-04-19vs OLYMPIC 18AM5.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Halleck / Joel Parrish vs Alexander Buckley / Jesse Levitin3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesChristophe Prompt vs Arjith Jayaraman2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Saucy / Trevor Pinder vs Alexander Brenner / Patrick Dwyer6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings25 teams · Men's 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CALIFORNIA TC 18AM5.0A9124615188
2ORINDA CC 18AM5.0A9124617217
3CUESTA TC 18AM5.0A9123719235
4BROOKSIDE 18AM5.0A8223716195
5OLYMPIC 18AM5.0A82201022182
6BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0A7119512139
7SUTTER LAWN 18AM5.0A73201025220
8SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM5.0A73201026240
9LOS GATOS SR 18AM5.0A6215919189
10SAN FRAN ST U 18AM5.0A64191125217
11WASHINGTON PK 18AM5.0A64171331252
12GOLDMAN TC 18AM5.0A55171330236
13MERVYN MORRIS PK 18AM5.0A55171331258
14FREMONT TC 18AM5.0A55151537283
15SAN PABLO PK 18AM5.0A55131738272
16RINCONADA PK 18AM5.0A55121838291
17SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM5.0C46131735261
18ST MARY 18AM5.0A46131738279
19RIO DEL ORO 18AM5.0A37102044310
20OLYMPIC 18AM5.0B1862144275
21RINCONADA PK 18AM5.0B19102044323
22ROUND HILL CC 18AM5.0A1962450330
23SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM5.0B1942654346
24NOVATO TC/PIONEER PK 18AM5.0A0912652319
25BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0B01052552343

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Mernit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
David Halleck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.67
John Hackbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.51
Michael Viani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.47
Christophe Prompt
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.45
Trevor Pinder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.39
David Mullarkey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.37
Seth Nobmann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.34
Joel Parrish
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.29
Michael Saucy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published
4.21
Tom Veach
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
4.13
Olivier Picault
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Hackbert + Adam Mernit033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Adam Mernit
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
David Halleck
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Hackbert
0W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
4.67
Michael Viani
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.51
5
Christophe Prompt
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.47
Trevor Pinder
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.45
4.5
David Mullarkey
11W–9L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.39
Seth Nobmann
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.37
Joel Parrish
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.34
Michael Saucy
11W–3L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
Tom Veach
9W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.21
Olivier Picault
16W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.