BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0B
2026 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 5.0
21 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule10 played
i
Flight standings25 teams · Men's 5.0
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1CALIFORNIA TC 18AM5.0A | 9 | 1 | 15 | 188 |
| 2ORINDA CC 18AM5.0A | 9 | 1 | 17 | 217 |
| 3CUESTA TC 18AM5.0A | 9 | 1 | 19 | 235 |
| 4BROOKSIDE 18AM5.0A | 8 | 2 | 16 | 195 |
| 5OLYMPIC 18AM5.0A | 8 | 2 | 22 | 182 |
| 6BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0A | 7 | 1 | 12 | 139 |
| 7SUTTER LAWN 18AM5.0A | 7 | 3 | 25 | 220 |
| 8SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM5.0A | 7 | 3 | 26 | 240 |
| 9LOS GATOS SR 18AM5.0A | 6 | 2 | 19 | 189 |
| 10SAN FRAN ST U 18AM5.0A | 6 | 4 | 25 | 217 |
| 11WASHINGTON PK 18AM5.0A | 6 | 4 | 31 | 252 |
| 12GOLDMAN TC 18AM5.0A | 5 | 5 | 30 | 236 |
| 13MERVYN MORRIS PK 18AM5.0A | 5 | 5 | 31 | 258 |
| 14FREMONT TC 18AM5.0A | 5 | 5 | 37 | 283 |
| 15SAN PABLO PK 18AM5.0A | 5 | 5 | 38 | 272 |
| 16RINCONADA PK 18AM5.0A | 5 | 5 | 38 | 291 |
| 17SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM5.0C | 4 | 6 | 35 | 261 |
| 18ST MARY 18AM5.0A | 4 | 6 | 38 | 279 |
| 19RIO DEL ORO 18AM5.0A | 3 | 7 | 44 | 310 |
| 20OLYMPIC 18AM5.0B | 1 | 8 | 44 | 275 |
| 21RINCONADA PK 18AM5.0B | 1 | 9 | 44 | 323 |
| 22ROUND HILL CC 18AM5.0A | 1 | 9 | 50 | 330 |
| 23SUNNYVALE MTC 18AM5.0B | 1 | 9 | 54 | 346 |
| 24NOVATO TC/PIONEER PK 18AM5.0A | 0 | 9 | 52 | 319 |
| 25BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM5.0B | 0 | 10 | 52 | 343 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Alex Stolyar + Juan Pablo Gonzalez | 3–1 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Aneil Kamboj + Eric Tsai | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Eric Tsai + Nghien Nguyen | 2–1 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.