Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Tieff

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W PM

22 players · average NTRP 4.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-06Split 11
L#1 DoublesKrysia Leason / Marsha Elmore vs Tiffany Kasteler / Staci McCubbins4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJan Chamberlain / Susan Nelson vs Anji DowDell / Regina Johnson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-31vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberrySplit 11
L#2 DoublesKrysia Leason / Marsha Elmore vs Michelle Ainge / Tena Maughan6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBerit Campion / Jan Chamberlain vs Shelli Johnston / Halli Craft5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-23Lost 02
L#2 DoublesNalisa Dunford / Amy Powell vs Dalynn Thomas / Lisa Stebbing4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKrysia Leason / Aimee Nilson vs Alena Taylor / Angela Bleak3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Powell / Aimee Nilson vs Debra Knowlton / Nicole Reese2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-18vs Cottonwood Club-WarrenLost 01
L#1 DoublesShelley Hunter / Krysia Leason vs Janice Smith / Kathy Miller-Rees0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-06-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShelley Hunter / Krysia Leason vs Melissa Despain / Staci McCubbins3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Lindsay Knight
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.83
Becky Raymond
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.78
Krysia Leason
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Regan Tieff
published 4
3.72
Kalee King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.65
Renee Utgaard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Shelley Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Jan Chamberlain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Jennifer Moreton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.57
Sarah Love
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.56
Marsha Elmore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.54
Berit Campion
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Susan Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Nicole Mills
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Kim Levine
published
3.50
3.45
Aimee Nilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Amy Powell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.17
Sarah Law
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
LaNece Andreason
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nalisa Dunford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah DeMark
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Powell + Regan Tieff9265% games+12.0% vs expected
Sarah DeMark + Jennifer Moreton4153% games+9.0% vs expected
Renee Utgaard + Becky Raymond14460% games+8.1% vs expected
Jennifer Moreton + Regan Tieff9163% games+6.7% vs expected
Jennifer Moreton + Susan Nelson6653% games+4.8% vs expected
Krysia Leason + Marsha Elmore4456% games+4.8% vs expected
Renee Utgaard + Jennifer Moreton3648% games+3.1% vs expected
Shelley Hunter + Jennifer Moreton3356% games+2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Knight
110W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Becky Raymond
81W–68L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Krysia Leason
45W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Regan Tieff
196W–107L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kalee King
117W–93L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Renee Utgaard
156W–111L career · 6 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Shelley Hunter
96W–100L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Jan Chamberlain
50W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Jennifer Moreton
103W–122L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Sarah Love
200W–135L career · 5 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Marsha Elmore
37W–64L career · 8 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Berit Campion
104W–139L career · 4 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
Susan Nelson
65W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
Nicole Mills
88W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
Kim Levine
92W–62L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Cassandra Suite-Smith
43W–54L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Aimee Nilson
53W–119L career · 2 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.45
4
Amy Powell
99W–65L career · 1 line in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.45
Sarah Law
85W–85L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
LaNece Andreason
42W–88L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nalisa Dunford
17W–30L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah DeMark
27W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.