Teams

GCC TEAL

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-31vs GNO PINKWon 21
L#1 DoublesNell Thomas / Katie Shader vs Stacie Cowell / Lisa Heichel3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCaroline Zanner vs Lauren Turra6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Davydov / Aenny Chung vs Leigh Shubin / Tonya Fallows6-1, 6-0
2026-05-27vs SKY GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Mauro / Grace Rochman vs Kristi Desfosses / Erin Gray6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAenny Chung vs Holly Stuart6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNell Thomas / Brooke McCready vs Robin McCaffery / Mary Gambrill2-6, 3-6
2026-05-17vs CHCC PURPLELost 01
L#1 SinglesKatie Shader vs Christine Loeffler2-6, 2-6
2026-05-14vs VC TEALLost 12
L#1 DoublesGrace Rochman / Sarah Nelson vs Vineeta Laxminarayan / Traci Samaras2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNell Thomas vs Rachel Laskoski2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Shader / Kelly Mauro vs Catherine Murchison / Page Rollert3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-13vs WP-G YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Mauro / Katie Shader vs Danielle Renaud / Allison Blue1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAenny Chung / Nell Thomas vs Jenna Heinemeyer / Logan Wilson2-6, 1-6
2026-04-22vs WP-O NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesCaroline Zanner / Aenny Chung vs Kara Akers / Cody Galloway6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKelly Mauro vs MK Williams5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNell Thomas / Sarah Nelson vs Savanna Johnson / Elizabeth Mink5-7, 0-6
2026-04-15vs EM BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Shader / Sarah Nelson vs Amy Borman / Jenny Willits0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Saad vs Barb Lindvall1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke McCready / Wendy Davydov vs Kristi Lamar / Cissie Busch7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings46 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HV SILVER70241125276
2CVTA BLACK61251025262
3KC-RH GREEN61231227258
4TTA PINK6126928283
5LEBTC GOLD6126929291
6SKY BLACK51181227245
7RHCC YELLOW52221331273
8VC PINK52231231259
9BCC ORANGE52241131297
10FOX NAVY52221332285
11MC NAVY52221333286
12GAC PURPLE52191635276
13SKY YELLOW52201536305
14VCC GREEN52181739295
15CHCC GOLD43201532266
16CPV RED43201536295
17KNO BLUE43181737293
18PCC GOLD43211437297
19DTP NAVY43201538326
20SH GOLD43181741325
21LEBTC PINK43181742327
22BCC GOLD43181742318
23BM BLUE43152044347
24RCC RED34171839327
25KNO RED34171841312
26SS-LT TEAL34181741324
27PRKR NAVY34161943335
28SS-H BLACK34152043334
29GPTC RED34161944340
30BCC YELLOW34152044315
31CM ORANGE34142145342
32CM TEAL34142145333
33DTP PINK24121840300
34DPR-B TEAL24111941294
35SS-LT GOLD25152046326
36DCHS YELLOW25132247326
37WC RED25122351367
38MVCC PURPLE25102552373
39WP-O RED15131740284
40GR SILVER16142145332
41KC-RH ORANGE16122348349
42SS-H RED16122349349
43PCC SILVER16122349355
44CCC TEAL16102555369
45SS-LT RED1682756368
46GCC TEAL1662962387

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Caroline Zanner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.64
Aenny Chung
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.44
Wendy Davydov
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Kristin Saad
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.33
Kelly Mauro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.06
Grace Rochman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Brooke McCready
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.93
Nell Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
1.89
Katie Shader
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aenny Chung + Caroline Zanner8085% games+23.2% vs expected
Kelly Mauro + Kristin Saad8166% games+11.6% vs expected
Brooke McCready + Nell Thomas1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Caroline Zanner
13W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.81
2.5
Aenny Chung
12W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%14%86%
2.64
Wendy Davydov
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
Kristin Saad
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%89%11%
2.34
Kelly Mauro
27W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Grace Rochman
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Brooke McCready
4W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Nell Thomas
3W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Katie Shader
10W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.