Teams

DTP NAVY

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-27vs DTC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Virta / Lauren Stoffel vs Elana Schwartzreich / Jennifer Bowlds6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Bingler / Christine Warnert vs Barri Kass / Sarah Auchterlonie1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-26vs WP GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Stoffel / Michelle Virta vs Hillary Locke / Maddison Swanson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlicia Henry vs Lauren Zimmaro6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPauline Shaffer / Elizabeth Tandler vs Claudia McSweeney / Leslie Wicks4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-05-22vs CM NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Virta / Lauren Stoffel vs Melissa Alzubaidi / Kay Teitelbaum7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesPauline Shaffer vs Kate Levy4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Fritsch / Susan Bingler vs Candace Johnson / Ellen Sarcone3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-20vs SKY PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Stoffel / Michelle Virta vs Kathleen Newman / Bryn Miller6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Tandler vs Pamela Wandry6-1, 6-1
2026-05-07vs WP-C ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlicia Henry / Christine Warnert vs Danyi Zacarias / Emilia Quiroga7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Tandler vs Katie Sabbia6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPauline Shaffer / Susan Bingler vs Gwendolyn Bradshaw / Nina Cruchon6-4, 6-4
2026-04-22vs CACM YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Stoffel / Michelle Virta vs Pamela Schiess / Chandra Jones7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Tandler vs Ann Flanagan6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPauline Shaffer / Janice Fritsch vs Sara Whitley / Marisa Alger2-6, 1-6
2026-04-15vs EM PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesAlicia Henry / Christine Warnert vs Mandi Williams / Lisa LoJacono0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesPauline Shaffer vs Sarah Nottingham6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Bingler / Janice Fritsch vs Maricela Barbosa Galvez / Natalie Dean0-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings46 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HV SILVER70241125276
2CVTA BLACK61251025262
3KC-RH GREEN61231227258
4TTA PINK6126928283
5LEBTC GOLD6126929291
6SKY BLACK51181227245
7RHCC YELLOW52221331273
8VC PINK52231231259
9BCC ORANGE52241131297
10FOX NAVY52221332285
11MC NAVY52221333286
12GAC PURPLE52191635276
13SKY YELLOW52201536305
14VCC GREEN52181739295
15CHCC GOLD43201532266
16CPV RED43201536295
17KNO BLUE43181737293
18PCC GOLD43211437297
19DTP NAVY43201538326
20SH GOLD43181741325
21LEBTC PINK43181742327
22BCC GOLD43181742318
23BM BLUE43152044347
24RCC RED34171839327
25KNO RED34171841312
26SS-LT TEAL34181741324
27PRKR NAVY34161943335
28SS-H BLACK34152043334
29GPTC RED34161944340
30BCC YELLOW34152044315
31CM ORANGE34142145342
32CM TEAL34142145333
33DTP PINK24121840300
34DPR-B TEAL24111941294
35SS-LT GOLD25152046326
36DCHS YELLOW25132247326
37WC RED25122351367
38MVCC PURPLE25102552373
39WP-O RED15131740284
40GR SILVER16142145332
41KC-RH ORANGE16122348349
42SS-H RED16122349349
43PCC SILVER16122349355
44CCC TEAL16102555369
45SS-LT RED1682756368
46GCC TEAL1662962387

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Elizabeth Tandler
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.51
Lauren Stoffel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Michelle Virta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Pauline Shaffer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.31
Susan Bingler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Christine Warnert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.13
Alicia Henry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.96
Janice Fritsch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Stoffel + Michelle Virta7164% games+11.6% vs expected
Christine Warnert + Elizabeth Tandler8253% games+3.1% vs expected
Janice Fritsch + Pauline Shaffer4252% games+2.1% vs expected
Janice Fritsch + Susan Bingler2541% games+1.3% vs expected
Alicia Henry + Elizabeth Tandler2344% games−4.0% vs expected
Janice Fritsch + Elizabeth Tandler4156% gamesnot enough data
Christine Warnert + Alicia Henry044 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Tandler + Pauline Shaffer224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Elizabeth Tandler
41W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.61
Lauren Stoffel
10W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
Michelle Virta
11W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
Pauline Shaffer
16W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40
Susan Bingler
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Christine Warnert
19W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Alicia Henry
21W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Janice Fritsch
13W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.