Teams

VC PINK

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-27vs WP-O BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesWhitner Carlin / Devon Helm vs Maria Bakaj Wines / Carmen Hart6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAlison Wente vs Katie Philpot4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Stamatis / Caitlin Johnson vs Julie Dugdale / Natalie Levanway7-6, 6-2
2026-05-20vs GCC GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlison Wente / Bryann Nourse vs Deb Ridenour / Danora Gotto7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSimrall Kelley / Marcie Haley vs Jennifer Lloyd / Nicole Wiechecki0-6, 0-6
2026-05-13vs HV GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristin Pietsch / Whitner Carlin vs Jessica Horne / Erin Pimm4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAlison Wente vs Kyomi Gale3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBryann Nourse / Catherine Jenkins vs Carla Marugan / Heather Peters6-3, 6-3
2026-05-11vs PTC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesDevon Helm / Whitner Carlin vs Maureen Radtke / Christine Trigg6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlison Wente / Kristin Pietsch vs Alexandra Swanson / Evelyn Snyder6-3, 6-3
2026-05-06vs CHCC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Johnson / Emily Stamatis vs Ali Bolling / Monica Zakovich6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBryann Nourse vs Emily Olson2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarcie Haley / Alison Wente vs Maude Mahoney / Zoe Williams0-6, 3-6
2026-04-22vs GAC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Johnson / Emily Stamatis vs Mary Stewart / Leah Putnam3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDevon Helm vs Michelle Gruber6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnna Reed / Marcie Haley vs Melissa Brunkow / Gwen Hubbard4-6, 5-7
2026-04-15vs EM REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWhitner Carlin / Bryann Nourse vs Laurel Weinstein / Lisa Freedberg6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Jenkins / Kristin Pietsch vs Elizabeth Sundberg / Molly McGill2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings46 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HV SILVER70241125276
2CVTA BLACK61251025262
3KC-RH GREEN61231227258
4TTA PINK6126928283
5LEBTC GOLD6126929291
6SKY BLACK51181227245
7RHCC YELLOW52221331273
8VC PINK52231231259
9BCC ORANGE52241131297
10FOX NAVY52221332285
11MC NAVY52221333286
12GAC PURPLE52191635276
13SKY YELLOW52201536305
14VCC GREEN52181739295
15CHCC GOLD43201532266
16CPV RED43201536295
17KNO BLUE43181737293
18PCC GOLD43211437297
19DTP NAVY43201538326
20SH GOLD43181741325
21LEBTC PINK43181742327
22BCC GOLD43181742318
23BM BLUE43152044347
24RCC RED34171839327
25KNO RED34171841312
26SS-LT TEAL34181741324
27PRKR NAVY34161943335
28SS-H BLACK34152043334
29GPTC RED34161944340
30BCC YELLOW34152044315
31CM ORANGE34142145342
32CM TEAL34142145333
33DTP PINK24121840300
34DPR-B TEAL24111941294
35SS-LT GOLD25152046326
36DCHS YELLOW25132247326
37WC RED25122351367
38MVCC PURPLE25102552373
39WP-O RED15131740284
40GR SILVER16142145332
41KC-RH ORANGE16122348349
42SS-H RED16122349349
43PCC SILVER16122349355
44CCC TEAL16102555369
45SS-LT RED1682756368
46GCC TEAL1662962387

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Devon Helm
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.45
Bryann Nourse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.42
Whitner Carlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Kristin Pietsch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.23
Alison Wente
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.17
Emily Stamatis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.16
Caitlin Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.14
Catherine Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.76
Simrall Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.64
Marcie Haley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Stamatis + Caitlin Johnson6745% games+2.5% vs expected
Marcie Haley + Simrall Kelley044 matchesnot enough data
Whitner Carlin + Bryann Nourse303 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Pietsch + Alison Wente213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Devon Helm
4W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
2.5
Bryann Nourse
5W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
Whitner Carlin
9W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
Kristin Pietsch
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Alison Wente
6W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Emily Stamatis
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Caitlin Johnson
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Catherine Jenkins
5W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Simrall Kelley
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.76
Marcie Haley
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.