Teams

Marion/Greene/40&over3.0W

2025 Marion Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult Women 40 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-16vs FK Big Shots - LongWon 20
W#1 DoublesHelen Ingmarsson / Kristin Milbrandt vs Guisela Carrascosa / Oksana Velis6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarla Intal vs Gretta Payne6-1, 6-2
2025-06-14vs FK Big Shots - LongSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCarla Intal vs Rebecca Long6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVictoria McClintock / Helen Ingmarsson vs Georgina Bumpas / Raksha Ramkissoon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-09vs CCO Aces - McLellanWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarla Intal vs Susie Friedland6-2, 6-4
2025-06-07vs FK Big Shots - LongSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLisa Booth vs Rebecca Long1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRachael Seidler / Michelle Burns vs Sherry Louise Gronlund / NANCY TUTEN6-1, 6-1
2025-06-01vs CCO Aces - McLellanWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Burns / Marisa Rodriguez vs Ellen Smith / CARMEL CONNOR6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJholie Lawrence vs Susie Friedland7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanet Greene / Lauren Joyce vs Kendall Mora / Frances Ramirez6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMarisa Rodriguez / Janet Greene vs Sophia Crawley / Tatyana Liversedge6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJholie Lawrence vs Sarah Osian1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Roberson / Victoria McClintock vs Beth Dellovade / Cyndee Blackert6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesUyen Dao / Michelle Burns vs Jane Ryals / Kelli Ditty6-1, 6-4
2025-05-10vs CCO Aces - McLellanWon 10
W#1 SinglesLisa Booth vs Susie Friedland6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Ratliff / Rachael Seidler vs Angela Ba / Caressa Gray5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarla Intal vs Cyndee Blackert6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Carla Intal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Lisa Booth
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Michelle Burns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Janet Greene
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Victoria McClintock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Nina Stanton
published
2.94
Helen Ingmarsson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Kristin Milbrandt
published
2.89
Marisa Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Lauren Joyce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Rachael Seidler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Uyen Dao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Laura Roberson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Jennifer Mendola
published
2.70
Jholie Lawrence
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.65
Jodi McClure
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachael Seidler + Michelle Burns5155% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Rodriguez + Michelle Burns404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carla Intal
112W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Lisa Booth
168W–85L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Michelle Burns
26W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.07
Janet Greene
26W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Victoria McClintock
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Nina Stanton
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Helen Ingmarsson
42W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
2.94
Kristin Milbrandt
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Marisa Rodriguez
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lauren Joyce
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Rachael Seidler
77W–124L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
Uyen Dao
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Laura Roberson
25W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Jennifer Mendola
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Jholie Lawrence
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Jodi McClure
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.