Teams

Stanley/Sherwood/BP

2022 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Abby Richards
published 4
3.73
Molly Murdock
published
3.35
Carolyn Wells
published 3.5
3.33
Ann Perry
published 3.5
3.31
Milli Stanley
published
3.26
Margaret Hoskyn
published
Amy Lane
published 3.5
Carmen Scruggs
published 3.5
3.18
Amy Rainey
published 3.5
3.11
Lauren Shillcutt
published
2.99
Ericka Miller
published 3
2.84
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Hoskyn + Milli Stanley1634% games−0.4% vs expected
Margaret Hoskyn + Ann Perry4157% gamesnot enough data
Milli Stanley + Amy Rainey213 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Wells + Amy Rainey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abby Richards
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Murdock
28W–19L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Carolyn Wells
29W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Ann Perry
43W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Milli Stanley
46W–51L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Margaret Hoskyn
41W–31L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amy Lane
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Carmen Scruggs
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Rainey
26W–30L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Lauren Shillcutt
14W–18L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Ericka Miller
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Anna Catherine Cargile
19W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.