Teams

DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-14vs PLEASANTON 18AW3.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarissa Swanson / Kari Trimble vs Dongjie Fan / Shiow-Rong Lin6-2, 6-4
2023-06-12vs CASTLEWOOD CC 18AW3.0ALost 01
L#1 SinglesKari Trimble vs Jennifer Decoite4-6, 1-6
2023-05-23vs BLACKHAWK CC 18AW3.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesKari Trimble / Florita Labrador vs Mimi King / Jazy Zhang4-6, 4-6
2023-04-23vs CROW CANYON CC 18AW3.0ALost 01
L#2 SinglesKari Trimble vs Julia Gillette2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
KIM HOLLAND
published
3.25
Molly Evans
published
3.18
Melissa Bach
published
3.15
Carissa Swanson
published 3.5
3.14
Kari Trimble
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.11
Michelle Weiss
published
3.03
Diana Rosdahl
published 3
3.02
Mickie Kerr
published
3.00
Michelle Cooke
published
3.00
Kirsten Lang
published
2.95
Karen Bibel
published
2.93
Florita Labrador
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Pelen Wu
published
2.90
Jessica Soltz Rudd
published
2.85
Angela Shiu
published 3
2.85
Malou Matthew
published
2.85
Olga Keselman
published
2.83
Fedwa Booth
published 3
2.67
Elaine Marshall
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Weiss + Kari Trimble5158% games+5.0% vs expected
Michelle Weiss + Michelle Cooke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KIM HOLLAND
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Molly Evans
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.25
Melissa Bach
39W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.18
3.5
Carissa Swanson
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
Kari Trimble
44W–63L career · 6 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
Michelle Weiss
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.11
3
Diana Rosdahl
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.03
Mickie Kerr
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.02
Michelle Cooke
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Kirsten Lang
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.00
Karen Bibel
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Florita Labrador
69W–72L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Pelen Wu
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
Jessica Soltz Rudd
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Angela Shiu
2W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
2.85
Malou Matthew
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
Olga Keselman
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Fedwa Booth
12W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Elaine Marshall
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.