Teams

Smith/18/6.5/CM/QTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 6.5 Shrev

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Sep 15 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 22 7:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 29 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Oct 6 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Oct 13 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Oct 20 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
2026-09-01vs Deere/18/6.5/CM/STCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesDaniel Steward / Hayden Latour vs Kyle Mayfield / Corey Oliphint3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAsjad Mansoor / Luis Martinez-nater vs Jon Bryn / Christian Frierson6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAkhilesh Babbili / Nishyant Jani vs Sean Deere / Daniel Moore6-2, 6-1
2026-08-25vs Pipes/18/6.5/CM/BTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAsjad Mansoor / Luis Martinez-nater vs Chris Thiels / Shane Faulkner6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndre Joshua Mira / Akhilesh Babbili vs Daniel Brignac / William Coats6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Steward / Nishyant Jani vs Lee Daville / Lane McKenzie3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-18vs Ashton/18/6.5/CM/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesParker Smith / Akhilesh Babbili vs John Hawkins / Kevin Lamb6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLucas Chen / Thaddaeus Wallace vs David Courtney / Lorand Csoma1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHayden Latour / Steven Bush vs Chase Stripland / Erik Luttkus0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 6.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ashton/18/6.5/CM/BTC1030111
2Stuart/18/6.5/CM/BTC1021219
3Pipes/18/6.5/CM/BTC1021326
4Deere/18/6.5/CM/STCC0112529
5Pettiette/18/6.5/CM/POTC0112533
6Smith/18/6.5/CM/QTC0103634

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Tyler Howard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Steward
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Michael Hudson
published
2.95
Thaddaeus Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Luis Martinez-nater
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Akhilesh Babbili
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Steven Bush
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Hayden Latour
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lucas Chen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nishyant Jani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Howard
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Daniel Steward
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Hudson
18W–23L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Thaddaeus Wallace
32W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Luis Martinez-nater
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Akhilesh Babbili
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Steven Bush
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.77
Hayden Latour
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lucas Chen
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nishyant Jani
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.