Teams

Stuart/18/6.5/CM/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 6.5 Shrev

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 15 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 22 7:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 29 6:00 PM
Southern Trace Country Club
Oct 6 6:00 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 13 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 20 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
2026-09-01vs Ashton/18/6.5/CM/BTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Grisso / Aaron Hunt vs John Hawkins / Kevin Lamb6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAlexander Do / Isaac Thomas vs Dylan Williams / Lorand Csoma4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChris Singletary / Scott Sutton vs Chase Stripland / Jacob Wilhite6-0, 6-0
2026-08-25vs Deere/18/6.5/CM/STCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesRichard Morgan / Scott Sutton vs Jon Bryn / Corey Oliphint1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBlake Thomas / Isaac Thomas vs James Hatfield / Jeffrey Price7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAaron Burton / Aaron Hunt vs Jeff Terracciano / Abram Reyes6-1, 6-1
2026-08-18vs Pettiette/18/6.5/CM/POTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Singletary / Aaron Hunt vs Boothe Dugan / Jonathan Lattimore6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteven Anderson / Nak Choi vs Brennan Bernard / Marshall Johnson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 6.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ashton/18/6.5/CM/BTC1030111
2Stuart/18/6.5/CM/BTC1021219
3Pipes/18/6.5/CM/BTC1021326
4Deere/18/6.5/CM/STCC0112529
5Pettiette/18/6.5/CM/POTC0112533
6Smith/18/6.5/CM/QTC0103634

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Slattery Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Chris Singletary
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.58
Alexander Do
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Aaron Burton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Tim Stuart
published
3.09
Scott Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Nak Choi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Rahul Shah
published
2.91
Isaac Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Ryan Grisso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Slattery Johnson
66W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
3.5
Chris Singletary
46W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.62
3.5
Alexander Do
34W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Aaron Burton
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Tim Stuart
39W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Scott Sutton
30W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Nak Choi
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
Rahul Shah
12W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Isaac Thomas
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
Ryan Grisso
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.