Teams

Pipes/18/6.5/CM/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 6.5 Shrev

18 players · average NTRP 3.20 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 15 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 22 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 29 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Oct 6 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 13 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 20 6:00 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
2026-09-01vs Pettiette/18/6.5/CM/POTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAustin Hedges / William Coats vs Noah Baker / Boothe Dugan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJamie Pipes / Brian Bouillon vs William Stanley / James Hagan6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Thiels / David Wilkes vs Jonathan Lattimore / David Pettiette7-6, 6-2
2026-08-25vs Smith/18/6.5/CM/QTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesChris Thiels / Shane Faulkner vs Asjad Mansoor / Luis Martinez-nater7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Brignac / William Coats vs Andre Joshua Mira / Akhilesh Babbili2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLee Daville / Lane McKenzie vs Daniel Steward / Nishyant Jani3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-18vs Deere/18/6.5/CM/STCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Tilley / Brian Bouillon vs Corey Oliphint / Kyle Mayfield6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAustin Hedges / Lane McKenzie vs Jon Bryn / Christian Frierson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJamie Pipes / Craig McCloud vs Sean Deere / Daniel Moore7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 6.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ashton/18/6.5/CM/BTC1030111
2Stuart/18/6.5/CM/BTC1021219
3Pipes/18/6.5/CM/BTC1021326
4Deere/18/6.5/CM/STCC0112529
5Pettiette/18/6.5/CM/POTC0112533
6Smith/18/6.5/CM/QTC0103634

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Chris Tilley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Shane Faulkner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Michael Mazur
published
3.44
Daniel Brignac
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Jamie Pipes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Brian Furqueron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Chris Thiels
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.24
Austin Hedges
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Lee Daville
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Eric Basinger
published
3.16
Cody Lenert
published 3
3.07
Lane McKenzie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
William Coats
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Logan McConathy
published
2.97
Corey Pepper
published 3
2.96
Brian Bouillon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Craig McCloud
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Bill Bowdon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Coats + Bill Bowdon5069% games+20.4% vs expected
Chris Thiels + Craig McCloud5072% games+18.6% vs expected
Brian Furqueron + Eric Basinger2443% games+2.4% vs expected
Jamie Pipes + Austin Hedges2348% gamesnot enough data
Lee Daville + Brian Bouillon404 matchesnot enough data
Chris Tilley + Daniel Brignac123 matchesnot enough data
Brian Furqueron + Michael Mazur213 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Pipes + Daniel Brignac213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Tilley
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Shane Faulkner
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Michael Mazur
10W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Daniel Brignac
22W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.44
Jamie Pipes
39W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
Brian Furqueron
32W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3
Chris Thiels
40W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Austin Hedges
26W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Lee Daville
28W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Eric Basinger
15W–22L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Cody Lenert
24W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.16
Lane McKenzie
17W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
William Coats
53W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Logan McConathy
18W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Corey Pepper
22W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Brian Bouillon
29W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Craig McCloud
41W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Bill Bowdon
29W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.