Teams

Fleihan 4.5M 18s Mon

2024 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · MEN 4.5 18 & Over Mon PM

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-15vs Cochran 4.5M 18s MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJay Hitchcock / Brian Johnson vs Aaron Strasser / Howard Driggers6-2, 6-1
2024-04-08vs Burns 4.5M 18s MonWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Johnson / Neil Henderson vs Brooks Jackson / Eric Anthony6-2, 6-0
2024-04-01vs Falvey 4.5M 18s MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Johnson / Bryan Vescio vs Christopher Crouch / Brian Kreidler7-6, 6-1
2024-03-18vs Cochran 4.5M 18s MonLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Cohen / Brian Johnson vs Eric Nocera / Tyler Paul6-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 18 & Over Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Philip Kuntz
published
4.37
Brian Cohen
published 4.5
4.25
Owen Vescio
published
4.21
Bryan Vescio
published 4.5
4.18
Jay Hitchcock
published
4.17
Steven Denning
published
4.15
Neil Henderson
published
4.13
Ziad Fleihan
published
4.09
Michael Shade
published
4.06
Brian Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.05
William Feehan
published
4.04
Charlie Lambis
published 4.5
3.91
Tim Shaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlie Lambis + Bryan Vescio2350% gamesnot enough data
Ziad Fleihan + Philip Kuntz303 matchesnot enough data
Steven Denning + Charlie Lambis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philip Kuntz
24W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
4.47
4.5
Brian Cohen
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
4.37
Owen Vescio
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Bryan Vescio
37W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.21
Jay Hitchcock
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.18
Steven Denning
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.17
Neil Henderson
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.15
Ziad Fleihan
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
4.13
Michael Shade
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Brian Johnson
127W–77L career · 4 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
William Feehan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Charlie Lambis
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
Tim Shaw
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.