Teams

Idaho/Kowallis/65&Over8.0W

2023 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

10 players · average NTRP 3.79 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesJanet Wilson / Joy Blomberg vs Mary Adcox / Maureen Earl6-4, 6-1
2023-08-23vs Older but BetterWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanice Ehrhart / Kathy Scribner vs Jennifer Colson / Lori Layne6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Comiskey / Joy Blomberg vs Maureen Earl / Terry Hardy6-4, 7-5
2023-08-21vs Older but BetterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanice Ehrhart / Maria Turner vs Denise Shawver / Terry Hardy6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoy Blomberg / Janet Wilson vs Joanne Cornwell / Lori Layne0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesSandy Kowallis / Teresa Comiskey vs Mary Chodroff / Maureen Earl6-4, 6-4
2023-08-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesJanice Ehrhart / Maria Turner vs Terry Hardy / Jennifer Colson7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Kowallis/65&Over8.0W6015310116
2Older but Better0631532203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Kathy Scribner
published 4
3.75
Sandy Kowallis
published 4
3.59
Linda Western
published 4
3.38
Trang Pham
published 3.5
3.29
Janet Wilson
published 3.5
3.27
Barbara Miller
published 3.5
3.27
Maria Turner
published 4
Janice Ehrhart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joy Blomberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Teresa Comiskey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Miller + Linda Western4155% games+3.8% vs expected
Sandy Kowallis + Kathy Scribner8556% games−0.4% vs expected
Linda Western + Kathy Scribner11360% games−1.0% vs expected
Maria Turner + Kathy Scribner16656% games−4.8% vs expected
Teresa Comiskey + Janet Wilson141651% gamesnot enough data
Janice Ehrhart + Sandy Kowallis12456% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Kowallis + Trang Pham7162% gamesnot enough data
Janice Ehrhart + Maria Turner404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kathy Scribner
87W–43L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Sandy Kowallis
78W–51L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Linda Western
103W–83L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Trang Pham
147W–123L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Janet Wilson
151W–129L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Barbara Miller
68W–53L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
4
Maria Turner
116W–139L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.27
Janice Ehrhart
33W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joy Blomberg
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Teresa Comiskey
23W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.