Teams

Winter Winners/ Vineyards

2023 Collier Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-14vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftWon 10
W#3 DoublesGina Adiutori / Tara Newhall vs Kristy Cardina / Flora Rodriguez3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-07vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftWon 10
W#3 DoublesGina Adiutori / Diana Wong vs Lynne Hancock / Mira Rochford6-4, 6-4
2023-02-28vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftLost 01
L#1 SinglesDana Wagoner vs MacKenzie Kraft6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-02-14vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftWon 10
W#3 DoublesGina Adiutori / Catherine Brown vs Carolyn Matje / Cheryl Cohen7-6, 6-2
2023-02-07vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftWon 10
W#2 DoublesKari Gustafson / Gina Adiutori vs Carolyn Matje / Kristy Cardina6-2, 6-4
2023-01-31vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftLost 02
L#1 DoublesKari Gustafson / Gina Adiutori vs Sara Wachs / Lynn Johns6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMacKenzie Rickman / Cristina Arango vs Kristy Cardina / Lisa Luray5-7, 2-6
2023-01-29vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiana Wong / Cristina Arango vs Sara Wachs / Lynn Johns6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Dana Wagoner
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.27
4.26
Tara Newhall
published
4.25
Diana Wong
published 4.5
4.23
Gina Adiutori
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.23
Mackenzie Rickman
published
4.19
Jane Jhanji
published
4.08
Stephanie Foley
published
Cristina Arango
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Kari Gustafson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Adiutori + Dana Wagoner5552% games−6.6% vs expected
Jane Jhanji + Stephanie Foley123 matchesnot enough data
Mackenzie Rickman + Mary Miranda-Del Rossi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Wagoner
149W–38L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
Mary Miranda-Del Rossi
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
Tara Newhall
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Diana Wong
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Gina Adiutori
197W–104L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Mackenzie Rickman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Jane Jhanji
16W–23L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.19
Stephanie Foley
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Cristina Arango
58W–34L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kari Gustafson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.