Teams

Fowler Park (Diana Foregger)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 65 & Over Women · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-24vs Central Park (Gloria Parr)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Philipps / Nancy Merritt vs Vickie Andreaus / Vicky Ratchford3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Foregger / Mary Beth Bombardieri vs Vickie Sexton / Nancy Gravitt5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Woodard / Carol Kimbell vs Patsy Greer / Peggy Kelso6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-23vs Lanierland (Elizabeth Causey)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMarcia Coley / Kate Olsson vs Ann Nixon / Dancy Wynne5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Smutko / Cheryl Philipps vs Elizabeth Causey / Mary Casper3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Foregger / Lori McDaniel vs Lisa Lancaster / Barbara Griffeth3-6, 4-6
2025-10-17vs Soleil (Linda Struck)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Merritt / Marcia Coley vs Linda Struck / Babs Baldwin7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Smutko / Lori McDaniel vs Sharen Brown / Tineke Arzbach2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiana Foregger / Mary Beth Bombardieri vs Brenda Kees / Kathy Furlong1-6, 0-6
2025-10-03vs Central Park (Gloria Parr)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcia Coley / Kate Olsson vs Vickie Andreaus / Sue Ellis2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Foregger / Mary Beth Bombardieri vs Darcy Guffin / Patsy Greer4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesZona Buchen / Carol Kimbell vs Dianne Brock / Vicky Ratchford2-6, 2-6
2025-09-26vs Soleil (Linda Struck)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Philipps / Nancy Merritt vs Judy Shaffer / Sharen Brown6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Smutko / Mary Beth Bombardieri vs Tineke Arzbach / Lori Poer0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Foregger / Melissa Woodard vs Brenda Kees / Linda Struck1-6, 2-6
2025-09-19vs Lanierland (Elizabeth Causey)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesMarcia Coley / Kate Olsson vs Sharon Hortenstine / Terri Smiley6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKaren Smutko / Lori McDaniel vs Dancy Wynne / Betsy Morris4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1West Georgia TC (Sue Stovall)*6014410126
2East Roswell Park (Yvonne Krauter)*6014412145
3USTA Atlanta/Susie Dufresne5114412138
4Four Seasons (Jennie Jones)*5113513125
5Rockdale TC (Deborah Wilson)*4212613136
6Soleil (Linda Struck)*4211715134
7Central Park (Gloria Parr)*4211715155
8South Fulton (Joyce Frederick)*3310816150
9Wexford (Dede Young)*3381023170
10Sentinel Lake (Marti Felder)*3381023178
11Twin Lakes (Cynthia Jorgensen)*2481021178
12Bright Water (Kathy Pittman)*2471123179
13Fowler Park (Diana Foregger)*2481024171
14Lanierland (Elizabeth Causey)*2461225193
15Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)*2461226182
16Bishops Green (Janet Springfield)*1561224180
17Harrison (Kris Shubert)*0631530207
18Horseshoe Bend (Patty Spall)*0631531195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Karen Smutko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Cheryl Philipps
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Lori McDaniel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Marcia Coley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Mary Beth Bombardieri
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Nancy Merritt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Kate Olsson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Carol Kimbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Melissa Woodard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Diana Foregger
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.89
Zona Buchen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcia Coley + Nancy Merritt9556% games+3.4% vs expected
Diana Foregger + Carol Kimbell13458% games+0.8% vs expected
Karen Smutko + Lori McDaniel6449% games+0.5% vs expected
Mary Beth Bombardieri + Diana Foregger7652% games+0.1% vs expected
Nancy Merritt + Karen Smutko2544% games−4.6% vs expected
Kate Olsson + Marcia Coley134 matchesnot enough data
Kate Olsson + Diana Foregger314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Woodard + Zona Buchen134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Smutko
38W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Cheryl Philipps
19W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Lori McDaniel
11W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Marcia Coley
24W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
Mary Beth Bombardieri
15W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Nancy Merritt
49W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Kate Olsson
42W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Carol Kimbell
28W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Melissa Woodard
11W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Diana Foregger
133W–100L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
Zona Buchen
13W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.