Teams

Soleil (Linda Struck)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 65 & Over Women · 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-24vs Lanierland (Elizabeth Causey)*Split 11
L#1 DoublesTineke Arzbach / Sharen Brown vs Ann Nixon / Dancy Wynne3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBabs Baldwin / Judy Shaffer vs Elizabeth Causey / Mary Casper6-3, 6-2
2025-10-21vs Central Park (Gloria Parr)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesLori Poer / Babs Baldwin vs Vickie Andreaus / Sue Ellis4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrenda Kees / Tineke Arzbach vs Darcy Guffin / Vickie Sexton7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathy Furlong / Judy Shaffer vs Patsy Greer / Vicky Ratchford6-4, 6-2
2025-10-17vs Fowler Park (Diana Foregger)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Struck / Babs Baldwin vs Nancy Merritt / Marcia Coley5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSharen Brown / Tineke Arzbach vs Karen Smutko / Lori McDaniel6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrenda Kees / Kathy Furlong vs Diana Foregger / Mary Beth Bombardieri6-1, 6-0
2025-10-03vs Lanierland (Elizabeth Causey)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesJudy Shaffer / Linda Struck vs Dancy Wynne / Betsy Morris6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSharen Brown / Tineke Arzbach vs Kimberly Sekulow / Judy Hyde6-1, 6-0
2025-09-26vs Fowler Park (Diana Foregger)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJudy Shaffer / Sharen Brown vs Cheryl Philipps / Nancy Merritt3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTineke Arzbach / Lori Poer vs Karen Smutko / Mary Beth Bombardieri6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrenda Kees / Linda Struck vs Diana Foregger / Melissa Woodard6-1, 6-2
2025-09-22vs Central Park (Gloria Parr)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBabs Baldwin / Judy Shaffer vs Vickie Andreaus / Sue Ellis6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSharen Brown / Tineke Arzbach vs Vickie Sexton / Nancy Gravitt6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLinda Struck / Kathy Furlong vs Gloria Parr / Darcy Guffin4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1West Georgia TC (Sue Stovall)*6014410126
2East Roswell Park (Yvonne Krauter)*6014412145
3USTA Atlanta/Susie Dufresne5114412138
4Four Seasons (Jennie Jones)*5113513125
5Rockdale TC (Deborah Wilson)*4212613136
6Soleil (Linda Struck)*4211715134
7Central Park (Gloria Parr)*4211715155
8South Fulton (Joyce Frederick)*3310816150
9Wexford (Dede Young)*3381023170
10Sentinel Lake (Marti Felder)*3381023178
11Twin Lakes (Cynthia Jorgensen)*2481021178
12Bright Water (Kathy Pittman)*2471123179
13Fowler Park (Diana Foregger)*2481024171
14Lanierland (Elizabeth Causey)*2461225193
15Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)*2461226182
16Bishops Green (Janet Springfield)*1561224180
17Harrison (Kris Shubert)*0631530207
18Horseshoe Bend (Patty Spall)*0631531195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Brenda Kees
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Lori Poer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Tineke Arzbach
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.34
Sharen Brown
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.31
Judy Shaffer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.24
Babs Baldwin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Kathy Furlong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Linda Struck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Kees + Judy Shaffer8084% games+18.8% vs expected
Kathy Furlong + Judy Shaffer5071% games+13.7% vs expected
Linda Struck + Brenda Kees12362% games+8.8% vs expected
Sharen Brown + Judy Shaffer5168% games+8.1% vs expected
Babs Baldwin + Lori Poer9361% games+3.0% vs expected
Babs Baldwin + Tineke Arzbach4356% games+1.9% vs expected
Tineke Arzbach + Sharen Brown34667% games−0.3% vs expected
Babs Baldwin + Brenda Kees7075% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brenda Kees
40W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.67
Lori Poer
23W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Tineke Arzbach
46W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Sharen Brown
41W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
Judy Shaffer
32W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Babs Baldwin
86W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Kathy Furlong
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Linda Struck
26W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.