Teams

Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 65 & Over Women · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-31vs East Roswell Park (Yvonne Krauter)*Split 11
W#1 DoublesTeresa Pierce / Sandra Thomson vs Cynthia Eade / Jo-Ann Pamboris7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPaula O'Boyle / Wanda Loggins vs Jill Price / Karen Vaglia7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-10-24vs Bright Water (Kathy Pittman)*Split 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Sullivan / Sandra Thomson vs Karen Boswell / Paula Locke2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Mayhew / Paula O'Boyle vs Rhona Albright / Deborah Hammond6-3, 6-2
2025-10-09vs Twin Lakes (Cynthia Jorgensen)*Lost 02
L#2 DoublesTeresa Pierce / Beth Hite vs Sally Chase / Cynthia Jorgensen4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDiane Chilton / Paula O'Boyle vs Susan Dignan / Cynthia Smith4-6, 3-6
2025-10-03vs Four Seasons (Jennie Jones)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Pierce / Linda Werren vs Denise Price / Marla Haynes7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandra Thomson / Kathy Mayhew vs Connie Fisher / Lu Anne Manry1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWanda Loggins / Karen Sullivan vs Barbara O'Brien / Sue Rhoden6-7, 2-6
2025-09-26vs Horseshoe Bend (Patty Spall)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesTeresa Pierce / Linda Werren vs Losia Tomlinson / Anne French5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Thomson / Kathy Mayhew vs Pat Price / Yvonne Kenny6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-19vs Rockdale TC (Deborah Wilson)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Cappy / Paula O'Boyle vs Sonnia Stoveall / Deborah Wilson4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Mayhew / Sandra Thomson vs Rose Marie Collins / Phyllis Mayfield6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Werren / Barbara Pasko vs Betty Hicks / Marianne Boehringer2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1West Georgia TC (Sue Stovall)*6014410126
2East Roswell Park (Yvonne Krauter)*6014412145
3USTA Atlanta/Susie Dufresne5114412138
4Four Seasons (Jennie Jones)*5113513125
5Rockdale TC (Deborah Wilson)*4212613136
6Soleil (Linda Struck)*4211715134
7Central Park (Gloria Parr)*4211715155
8South Fulton (Joyce Frederick)*3310816150
9Wexford (Dede Young)*3381023170
10Sentinel Lake (Marti Felder)*3381023178
11Twin Lakes (Cynthia Jorgensen)*2481021178
12Bright Water (Kathy Pittman)*2471123179
13Fowler Park (Diana Foregger)*2481024171
14Lanierland (Elizabeth Causey)*2461225193
15Hedgerows (Wanda Loggins)*2461226182
16Bishops Green (Janet Springfield)*1561224180
17Harrison (Kris Shubert)*0631530207
18Horseshoe Bend (Patty Spall)*0631531195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Teresa Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Paula O'Boyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Kathy Mayhew
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.04
Beth Hite
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Sandra Thomson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
Linda Werren
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.97
Carolyn Cappy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Wanda Loggins
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Sharon Hill
published
2.88
Barbara Pasko
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.57
Diane Chilton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Linda Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Pasko + Linda Ward11956% games+8.1% vs expected
Sandra Thomson + Linda Werren3943% games+5.5% vs expected
Teresa Pierce + Linda Werren1546% games+4.6% vs expected
Kathy Mayhew + Linda Werren131348% games+1.4% vs expected
Kathy Mayhew + Sandra Thomson122439% games−0.5% vs expected
Diane Chilton + Wanda Loggins51635% games−2.5% vs expected
Barbara Pasko + Diane Chilton2446% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Mayhew + Wanda Loggins224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teresa Pierce
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
Paula O'Boyle
19W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Kathy Mayhew
79W–83L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3.5
Beth Hite
0W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Sandra Thomson
48W–76L career · 5 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
Linda Werren
66W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3.5
Carolyn Cappy
0W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.97
Wanda Loggins
113W–136L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
Sharon Hill
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Barbara Pasko
39W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Diane Chilton
29W–72L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Linda Ward
61W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.