Teams

CDTA S M18&O7.0X g.Forest View Hayashida Sat 9 $21

CDTA Summer Mixed 18 & Over · CDTA S Mix 18 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.71 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesYasukazu Nagatake / Tomoko Hayashida vs Sarah Blankenbaker / Ben Hawke1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAkihiro Okumura / Kotomi Moran vs Catie Hughes / Rod Ganesan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHideaki Takahashi / Natsuki Yamamoto vs Sarah Young / Justin Booms6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesYasukazu Nagatake / Tomoko Hayashida vs Amy Carr / Joel McVey6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHideaki Takahashi / Kotomi Moran vs Huan Chang / Abiman Rajadurai7-6, 5-3
W#3 DoublesKenta Oikawa / Tina Schauls vs Naomi Fujimoto / Kevin Hartgerink6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesHideaki Takahashi / Kyoko Tachibana vs Marie Venckus / Cody Schullo2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYoshitaka Nakahara / Kotomi Moran vs Deborah Holt / Mariusz Cislak4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKenta Oikawa / Tina Schauls vs Lori Bieniek / Norlin Monzon4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesNatsuki Yamamoto / Yoshitaka Nakahara vs Michael Roth / Patricia Kladis-Schiappa7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAkihiro Okumura / Kotomi Moran vs Dwight Janzen / Jill LIVINGSTON6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKenta Oikawa / Tomoko Sekigami vs Kathie Melean / Atwood Burns6-2, 7-5
L#1 DoublesTsuyoshi Yamazaki / Yukiko Juretic vs Joanne Lund / Youngbin Lim0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAkihiro Okumura / Natsuki Yamamoto vs Robert Cal / Julie Hahn6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKenta Oikawa / Tomoko Sekigami vs Nina Friedman / Young Choi5-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesTsuyoshi Yamazaki / Yukiko Juretic vs Norbert Glod / Nabilah Knight5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYoshitaka Nakahara / Natsuki Yamamoto vs RICHARD FEFFER / Erica White6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKenta Oikawa / Kotomi Moran vs Jill Lauesen / Minh Hoang6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA S Mix 18 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M18&O7.0X e.McFetridge Baltazar Sat 4 $205115311106
2CDTA S M18&O7.0X a.Forest View Werts Sat 11 $215112614123
3CDTA S M18&O7.0X g.Forest View Hayashida Sat 9 $214213512150
4CDTA S M18&O7.0X d.Tam Wright Mon 7 $223371123164
5CDTA S M18&O7.0X f.Hinsdale Janzen Sat 10 $222471127195
6CDTA S M18&O7.0X c.Lakeshore Chang Sun 7 $261561225169
7CDTA S M18&O7.0X b.Score Thompson Thur 7 $201531530183

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Akihiro Okumura
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.91
Yasukazu Nagatake
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.90
Yoshitaka Nakahara
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Hideaki Takahashi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Kyoko Tachibana
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Yukiko Juretic
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.12
Mishez Avari
published 3.5
3.04
Tomoko Hayashida
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.79
Tina Schauls
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karn Sri
published
Kenta Oikawa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kotomi Moran
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Natsuki Yamamoto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Tomoko Sekigami
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tsuyoshi Yamazaki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yukiko Juretic + Hideaki Takahashi6554% games+6.6% vs expected
Yoshitaka Nakahara + Yukiko Juretic2746% games+6.4% vs expected
Tomoko Hayashida + Karn Sri6258% games+4.1% vs expected
Tomoko Hayashida + Hideaki Takahashi4445% games−6.6% vs expected
Tomoko Sekigami + Kenta Oikawa4844% gamesnot enough data
Tomoko Hayashida + Yasukazu Nagatake3450% gamesnot enough data
Tina Schauls + Kenta Oikawa3449% gamesnot enough data
Hideaki Takahashi + Natsuki Yamamoto7072% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Akihiro Okumura
60W–32L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Yasukazu Nagatake
68W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Yoshitaka Nakahara
99W–68L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Hideaki Takahashi
112W–68L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
Kyoko Tachibana
25W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Yukiko Juretic
89W–77L career · 7 lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Mishez Avari
53W–87L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Tomoko Hayashida
126W–186L career · 7 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Tina Schauls
70W–83L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
Karn Sri
49W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kenta Oikawa
61W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kotomi Moran
30W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Natsuki Yamamoto
25W–2L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tomoko Sekigami
15W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tsuyoshi Yamazaki
42W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.