Teams

CDTA S M18&O7.0X a.Forest View Werts Sat 11 $21

CDTA Summer Mixed 18 & Over · CDTA S Mix 18 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.43 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesBarbara Chmieleski / Michael Lawver vs Naomi Fujimoto / Abiman Rajadurai4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Werts / Cody Schullo vs Cynthia Schlesinger / Joel McVey4-6, 5-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoan Cooney / Jonathan Berggren vs Sandra Napoli-D'Arco / Robert Stauffer6-1, 6-3
2023-08-12Won 30
W#1 DoublesJoan Cooney / Cody Schullo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Chmieleski / John Ohrlund vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJill Werts / Jonathan Berggren vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesJill Werts / John Ohrlund vs Sarah Blankenbaker / Ben Hawke0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Holt / Mariusz Cislak vs Sarah Young / Howard Wu6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLori Bieniek / Norlin Monzon vs Haina Shin / Tarun Chawla0-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMarie Venckus / Norlin Monzon vs Wendy Leto / Atwood Burns3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeg LaMonica / Steven Dayon vs Patricia Kladis-Schiappa / Michael Roth7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoan Cooney / Mariusz Cislak vs Jill LIVINGSTON / Jeff Prokaski6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMarie Venckus / Michael Lawver vs Minh Hoang / Erica White6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSteven Dayon / Meg LaMonica vs Jeff Lemna / Melissa Maderia6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDeborah Holt / Mariusz Cislak vs RICHARD FEFFER / Ausra Vitkauskas6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesMarie Venckus / Cody Schullo vs Hideaki Takahashi / Kyoko Tachibana6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeborah Holt / Mariusz Cislak vs Yoshitaka Nakahara / Kotomi Moran6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Bieniek / Norlin Monzon vs Kenta Oikawa / Tina Schauls6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA S Mix 18 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M18&O7.0X e.McFetridge Baltazar Sat 4 $205115311106
2CDTA S M18&O7.0X a.Forest View Werts Sat 11 $215112614123
3CDTA S M18&O7.0X g.Forest View Hayashida Sat 9 $214213512150
4CDTA S M18&O7.0X d.Tam Wright Mon 7 $223371123164
5CDTA S M18&O7.0X f.Hinsdale Janzen Sat 10 $222471127195
6CDTA S M18&O7.0X c.Lakeshore Chang Sun 7 $261561225169
7CDTA S M18&O7.0X b.Score Thompson Thur 7 $201531530183

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Cody Schullo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Mariusz Cislak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Michael Lawver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Steven Dayon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Marie Venckus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Meg LaMonica
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Lori Bieniek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Barbara Chmieleski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Deborah Holt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.80
Joan Cooney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Jill Werts
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
John Ohrlund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Berggren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Norlin Monzon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg LaMonica + Steven Dayon292153% games+8.6% vs expected
John Ohrlund + Barbara Chmieleski104039% gamesnot enough data
Marie Venckus + Michael Lawver13755% gamesnot enough data
Marie Venckus + Mariusz Cislak6261% gamesnot enough data
Joan Cooney + Mariusz Cislak4354% gamesnot enough data
Joan Cooney + John Ohrlund0632% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Holt + Mariusz Cislak4251% gamesnot enough data
Lori Bieniek + John Ohrlund1436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cody Schullo
94W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Mariusz Cislak
254W–157L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
Michael Lawver
113W–124L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Steven Dayon
73W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Marie Venckus
92W–63L career · type M · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Meg LaMonica
93W–98L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Lori Bieniek
132W–126L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Barbara Chmieleski
60W–158L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Deborah Holt
58W–85L career · 3 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Joan Cooney
96W–133L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Jill Werts
81W–179L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
John Ohrlund
16W–66L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jonathan Berggren
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Norlin Monzon
14W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.