Teams

CDTA S M18&O7.0X e.McFetridge Baltazar Sat 4 $20

CDTA Summer Mixed 18 & Over · CDTA S Mix 18 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.73 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesSarah Blankenbaker / Ben Hawke vs Jill Werts / John Ohrlund6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Young / Howard Wu vs Deborah Holt / Mariusz Cislak7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHaina Shin / Tarun Chawla vs Lori Bieniek / Norlin Monzon6-0, 6-2
2023-08-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesHaina Shin / Tarun Chawla vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesSarah Blankenbaker / Justin Booms vs Youngbin Lim / Joanne Lund5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Lund / Ben Hawke vs Nick Paterakos / Sarah W Johnson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatie Hughes / Rod Ganesan vs Kristin Lamb / Carlos Waldron4-6, 4-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesSarah Blankenbaker / Ben Hawke vs Yasukazu Nagatake / Tomoko Hayashida6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatie Hughes / Rod Ganesan vs Akihiro Okumura / Kotomi Moran3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Young / Justin Booms vs Hideaki Takahashi / Natsuki Yamamoto3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMarjorie Baltazar / Justin Booms vs Karin Matura / Atwood Burns6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Terry / Ben Hawke vs Jeanine Janzen / Venkat Tipirneni6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesEmily Lund / Ben Hawke vs Elizabeth Tunney / Robert Stauffer6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Baltazar / Rod Ganesan vs Laura Keener / Abiman Rajadurai7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Young / Howard Wu vs Amy Carr / Kevin Hartgerink6-0, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA S Mix 18 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S M18&O7.0X e.McFetridge Baltazar Sat 4 $205115311106
2CDTA S M18&O7.0X a.Forest View Werts Sat 11 $215112614123
3CDTA S M18&O7.0X g.Forest View Hayashida Sat 9 $214213512150
4CDTA S M18&O7.0X d.Tam Wright Mon 7 $223371123164
5CDTA S M18&O7.0X f.Hinsdale Janzen Sat 10 $222471127195
6CDTA S M18&O7.0X c.Lakeshore Chang Sun 7 $261561225169
7CDTA S M18&O7.0X b.Score Thompson Thur 7 $201531530183

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Haina Shin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Justin Booms
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
David Shin
published 4
3.71
Sarah Blankenbaker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Emily Lund
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Ben Hawke
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Marjorie Baltazar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Rod Ganesan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Tarun Chawla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Howard Wu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Sarah Young
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Catie Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.28
Heejin Shin
published 3
Sarah Terry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Howard Wu + Sarah Blankenbaker7752% games+6.7% vs expected
Marjorie Baltazar + Rod Ganesan8365% games+2.8% vs expected
Catie Hughes + Rod Ganesan7449% gamesnot enough data
Catie Hughes + Ben Hawke5650% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Blankenbaker + Justin Booms3352% gamesnot enough data
Rod Ganesan + Emily Lund3357% gamesnot enough data
Ben Hawke + Emily Lund5161% gamesnot enough data
Rod Ganesan + Sarah Young314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Haina Shin
290W–131L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.95
Justin Booms
101W–55L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
David Shin
18W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Sarah Blankenbaker
175W–175L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Emily Lund
256W–130L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Ben Hawke
31W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Marjorie Baltazar
183W–85L career · 2 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Rod Ganesan
135W–81L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Tarun Chawla
58W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Howard Wu
80W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Sarah Young
21W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Catie Hughes
56W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3
Heejin Shin
3W–25L career · type S · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
2.28
Sarah Terry
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.